Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
'science can't explain X, therefore god did X' isn't a good argument
i think i tried like 300 different approaches to get him to understand
one method i tried was to ask him if "a magical unicorn did it" was a good explanation for antimatter asymmetry and he copy pasted an article of 'appeal to ridicule fallacy' as a response
why do i even try to be patient with these people
"Even though X is overdetermined, it isn't logically necessary, so I'm going to believe ~X"
"X is shown to be the case through human reasoning and perception, the only things we can base our beliefs on, so I'm going to believe ~X"
Not sure what on earth is going on here, but if you believe plants are sentient, you should go vegan so you kill less plants.