Instal Steam
login
|
bahasa
简体中文 (Tionghoa Sederhana)
繁體中文 (Tionghoa Tradisional)
日本語 (Bahasa Jepang)
한국어 (Bahasa Korea)
ไทย (Bahasa Thai)
Български (Bahasa Bulgaria)
Čeština (Bahasa Ceko)
Dansk (Bahasa Denmark)
Deutsch (Bahasa Jerman)
English (Bahasa Inggris)
Español - España (Bahasa Spanyol - Spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (Bahasa Spanyol - Amerika Latin)
Ελληνικά (Bahasa Yunani)
Français (Bahasa Prancis)
Italiano (Bahasa Italia)
Magyar (Bahasa Hungaria)
Nederlands (Bahasa Belanda)
Norsk (Bahasa Norwegia)
Polski (Bahasa Polandia)
Português (Portugis - Portugal)
Português-Brasil (Bahasa Portugis-Brasil)
Română (Bahasa Rumania)
Русский (Bahasa Rusia)
Suomi (Bahasa Finlandia)
Svenska (Bahasa Swedia)
Türkçe (Bahasa Turki)
Tiếng Việt (Bahasa Vietnam)
Українська (Bahasa Ukraina)
Laporkan kesalahan penerjemahan
'science can't explain X, therefore god did X' isn't a good argument
i think i tried like 300 different approaches to get him to understand
one method i tried was to ask him if "a magical unicorn did it" was a good explanation for antimatter asymmetry and he copy pasted an article of 'appeal to ridicule fallacy' as a response
why do i even try to be patient with these people
"Even though X is overdetermined, it isn't logically necessary, so I'm going to believe ~X"
"X is shown to be the case through human reasoning and perception, the only things we can base our beliefs on, so I'm going to believe ~X"
Not sure what on earth is going on here, but if you believe plants are sentient, you should go vegan so you kill less plants.