Steamをインストール
ログイン
|
言語
简体中文(簡体字中国語)
繁體中文(繁体字中国語)
한국어 (韓国語)
ไทย (タイ語)
български (ブルガリア語)
Čeština(チェコ語)
Dansk (デンマーク語)
Deutsch (ドイツ語)
English (英語)
Español - España (スペイン語 - スペイン)
Español - Latinoamérica (スペイン語 - ラテンアメリカ)
Ελληνικά (ギリシャ語)
Français (フランス語)
Italiano (イタリア語)
Bahasa Indonesia(インドネシア語)
Magyar(ハンガリー語)
Nederlands (オランダ語)
Norsk (ノルウェー語)
Polski (ポーランド語)
Português(ポルトガル語-ポルトガル)
Português - Brasil (ポルトガル語 - ブラジル)
Română(ルーマニア語)
Русский (ロシア語)
Suomi (フィンランド語)
Svenska (スウェーデン語)
Türkçe (トルコ語)
Tiếng Việt (ベトナム語)
Українська (ウクライナ語)
翻訳の問題を報告
but it was weird af. it could have been coincidence but i honestly feel like it was the comment that made me fart.
there's no smell either which is a disappointment but hopefully another one will come soon so i can plug my bum hole with my finger during the flatulence and get a good whiff of something nice.
William T. Rowe describes the decline of the Qing as "a perfect storm of three simultaneous problems: the external shock of the expanding West, a secular crisis caused by an accumulation of socioeconomic difficulties over the long term and more acute political dysfunctions associated with the familiar pattern of the dynastic cycle." As someone else suggested, Kenneth Pomeranz Great Divergance is critical in understanding this topic. Instead of viewing China as falling behind the Europeans, it is important to understand that the European experience was very much outside of the norms of economic and technological advance. China continued to advance at a normal rate, while Europe leaped forward. I would argue that this was mostly due to their colonization of other countries and lands, but that is up for debate among scholars.