Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Do u think the artist consider other factors like stats increase/lvl when he/she make cosmetic? NO. So dont be over thinking something dat not exist. Do u see any priest/mage look like a ♥♥♥♥♥♥ pirate? NO. And so on. None of your argurments is relevant at all. Btw, research your "lore" that u get as a argument AGAIN, u were wrong in most of the parts.
Creative is good, but dont too much. I admit that the set look cool but it ♥♥♥ up the hero. If u try to be smart, go somewhere else, LoL maybe, where they are so "creative" that make their champions look ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ similar to each other with cosmetics.
P/s: Their complaing is not stupid, they have their opinion, so do u. If u want to judge other ppl when they are not in the same page as you, then u r stupid.
Furthermore, handsome-ness is in the eye of the beholder, comparing similarities is not. This set would be spiffing on Kunkka, but not on Nortrom.
thus
hi kunkka