Steam'i Yükleyin
giriş
|
dil
简体中文 (Basitleştirilmiş Çince)
繁體中文 (Geleneksel Çince)
日本語 (Japonca)
한국어 (Korece)
ไทย (Tayca)
Български (Bulgarca)
Čeština (Çekçe)
Dansk (Danca)
Deutsch (Almanca)
English (İngilizce)
Español - España (İspanyolca - İspanya)
Español - Latinoamérica (İspanyolca - Latin Amerika)
Ελληνικά (Yunanca)
Français (Fransızca)
Italiano (İtalyanca)
Bahasa Indonesia (Endonezce)
Magyar (Macarca)
Nederlands (Hollandaca)
Norsk (Norveççe)
Polski (Lehçe)
Português (Portekizce - Portekiz)
Português - Brasil (Portekizce - Brezilya)
Română (Rumence)
Русский (Rusça)
Suomi (Fince)
Svenska (İsveççe)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamca)
Українська (Ukraynaca)
Bir çeviri sorunu bildirin
Do u think the artist consider other factors like stats increase/lvl when he/she make cosmetic? NO. So dont be over thinking something dat not exist. Do u see any priest/mage look like a ♥♥♥♥♥♥ pirate? NO. And so on. None of your argurments is relevant at all. Btw, research your "lore" that u get as a argument AGAIN, u were wrong in most of the parts.
Creative is good, but dont too much. I admit that the set look cool but it ♥♥♥ up the hero. If u try to be smart, go somewhere else, LoL maybe, where they are so "creative" that make their champions look ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ similar to each other with cosmetics.
P/s: Their complaing is not stupid, they have their opinion, so do u. If u want to judge other ppl when they are not in the same page as you, then u r stupid.
Furthermore, handsome-ness is in the eye of the beholder, comparing similarities is not. This set would be spiffing on Kunkka, but not on Nortrom.
thus
hi kunkka