Cài đặt Steam
đăng nhập
|
ngôn ngữ
简体中文 (Hán giản thể)
繁體中文 (Hán phồn thể)
日本語 (Nhật)
한국어 (Hàn Quốc)
ไทย (Thái)
Български (Bungari)
Čeština (CH Séc)
Dansk (Đan Mạch)
Deutsch (Đức)
English (Anh)
Español - España (Tây Ban Nha - TBN)
Español - Latinoamérica (Tây Ban Nha cho Mỹ Latin)
Ελληνικά (Hy Lạp)
Français (Pháp)
Italiano (Ý)
Bahasa Indonesia (tiếng Indonesia)
Magyar (Hungary)
Nederlands (Hà Lan)
Norsk (Na Uy)
Polski (Ba Lan)
Português (Tiếng Bồ Đào Nha - BĐN)
Português - Brasil (Bồ Đào Nha - Brazil)
Română (Rumani)
Русский (Nga)
Suomi (Phần Lan)
Svenska (Thụy Điển)
Türkçe (Thổ Nhĩ Kỳ)
Українська (Ukraine)
Báo cáo lỗi dịch thuật
Do u think the artist consider other factors like stats increase/lvl when he/she make cosmetic? NO. So dont be over thinking something dat not exist. Do u see any priest/mage look like a ♥♥♥♥♥♥ pirate? NO. And so on. None of your argurments is relevant at all. Btw, research your "lore" that u get as a argument AGAIN, u were wrong in most of the parts.
Creative is good, but dont too much. I admit that the set look cool but it ♥♥♥ up the hero. If u try to be smart, go somewhere else, LoL maybe, where they are so "creative" that make their champions look ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ similar to each other with cosmetics.
P/s: Their complaing is not stupid, they have their opinion, so do u. If u want to judge other ppl when they are not in the same page as you, then u r stupid.
Furthermore, handsome-ness is in the eye of the beholder, comparing similarities is not. This set would be spiffing on Kunkka, but not on Nortrom.
thus
hi kunkka