安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題
there are so many details on the towers and stuff for technicians to get to in order to make repairs to the rocket or ensure systems are functional
they have many arms, as you said, and with the Energia i'm working on atm, there are very few pictures of the real thing that it's hard to see what everything does or where it goes to.
in the rocket itself, you just need a crew "area" and then long, empty fuselages with a couple jet engines
I think it comes down to the fact that there is nowhere for these rockets to go in stormworks. I’m not certain they can be designed to do much more then just go up and parachute back down. Whereas, the pad has complex service and access arms that have to extend and retract, a water deluge system and a ton of other moving parts to engineer.
I made that mistake on my Soyuz, where the launch site had so much more effort than the rocket itself.