Nainstalovat Steam
přihlásit se
|
jazyk
简体中文 (Zjednodušená čínština)
繁體中文 (Tradiční čínština)
日本語 (Japonština)
한국어 (Korejština)
ไทย (Thajština)
български (Bulharština)
Dansk (Dánština)
Deutsch (Němčina)
English (Angličtina)
Español-España (Evropská španělština)
Español-Latinoamérica (Latin. španělština)
Ελληνικά (Řečtina)
Français (Francouzština)
Italiano (Italština)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonéština)
Magyar (Maďarština)
Nederlands (Nizozemština)
Norsk (Norština)
Polski (Polština)
Português (Evropská portugalština)
Português-Brasil (Brazilská portugalština)
Română (Rumunština)
Русский (Ruština)
Suomi (Finština)
Svenska (Švédština)
Türkçe (Turečtina)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamština)
Українська (Ukrajinština)
Nahlásit problém s překladem
there are so many details on the towers and stuff for technicians to get to in order to make repairs to the rocket or ensure systems are functional
they have many arms, as you said, and with the Energia i'm working on atm, there are very few pictures of the real thing that it's hard to see what everything does or where it goes to.
in the rocket itself, you just need a crew "area" and then long, empty fuselages with a couple jet engines
I think it comes down to the fact that there is nowhere for these rockets to go in stormworks. I’m not certain they can be designed to do much more then just go up and parachute back down. Whereas, the pad has complex service and access arms that have to extend and retract, a water deluge system and a ton of other moving parts to engineer.
I made that mistake on my Soyuz, where the launch site had so much more effort than the rocket itself.