Announcements and discussions regarding Huwhyte KF2 HoE+ and CD servers

research what the right to “Free Speech” that you are attempting to invoke means

TWI's community manager Yoshiro permabanned the RS2 player for sharing a meme on his discord channel. After the player complained about the ban not making any sense, Yoshiro suggested the player researches what the right to "Free Speech" means.

https://www.reddit.com/r/rs2vietnam/comments/oxsj8t/comment/h7oumkx

For starters, he suggested this comic from xkcd is used:

https://xkcd.com/1357/

Most important things first: Yoshiro is retarded, his take on free speech is retarded, the quoted comic is also retarded and Randall Munroe, the ♥♥♥ behind the XKCD comics, is an absolute midwit ♥♥♥♥♥♥. The only reason Yoshiro thinks it's not is because Yoshiro is more retarded than Munroe is. The ban is absolutely unjustified and dishonest, TWI's EULA and discussion rules are garbage, but even according to how these rules and EULA were interpreted and sold to TWI customers by Vice President Alan Wilson, the player didn't violate them. Now, let's unpack.

Free speech aka freedom of expression is a topic maybe too complex to cover in full in a KF2 blog, LMAO, so it's a hard task to tell what it is, but for our purposes it's quite easy to tell what it is NOT.

It definitely not the 1st amendment to the Constitution of the US, which says this:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

This amendment to the constitution merely recognizes or acknowledges the RIGHT of people to do these things, which are exercising whatever religion, expressing themselves freely, appeal unjust acts to authority in hopes to obtain justice and so on.

Rights are fundamental to human nature. The founding fathers were speaking of them as things imbued into human nature by our Creator. Although the Constitution or other founding documents like the Declaration of Independence are sort of religiously agnostic, they acknowledge that everything, including humanity, had to come from somewhere. There definitely was some kind of beginning, a big bang or whatever, that gave a start to everything, and who knows was there a sentient being of sorts who started all that or it's just blind nature and thus this "Creator" is largely non-sentient. Regardless, it's somewhat clear that:

1) There was a start and humanity through its generations necessarily had to come from it;
2) There necessarily had to be some forces behind it which we can summarily refer to as the "Creator".

It also is quite obvious that these rights aren't well protected so to speak. These rights can be exercised only as long as they are backed up by the threat of violence, or "might makes right". Basically, people at large tend to disregard each others rights and abuse their own and dismiss their human rights. There's no protection mechanism in the Universe that prevents such an abuse of rights of other humans.

But what can be quite easily observed that societies the humans build are less viable if these rights are violated and most likely inevitably collapse. This is why for a society that aims to last for long it's crucial to respect the human rights, including the freedom of expression.

There's also a whole can of worms on rights vs privileges, but all that is largely ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥. No matter what you call them, rights or privileges, you have to fight for them and push back against the abusers. A good share of people tend not to recognize your rights to do anything and you have to push back if you want to secure them.

Yes, sometimes it's not viable, e.g. in Soviet Union you would be shot dead by the government if you dared challenging it, so a lot of people had to put their tongues in their assess, but again, Soviet Union didn't last for long, which reinforces the observation that if one pushes against the human rights too hard and too far, there eventually will be a push back and the whole thing collapses.

Getting back to the first amendment, again, it RECOGNIZES the human right. Not confers it on citizens. Not allows the citizens to do it. Instead, citizens have it inherently, as their right. And the Bill of Rights just acknowledges that, because if not, there will eventually be violence, there will be social turmoil. Wise governors recognize that and do their best to avoid.

So, the right to free speech doesn't mean that the government just cannot arrest you for exercising it. It means that a society where this right is observed and respected, regardless of the written law and regardless if it happens in the US of A under the Constitution, is likelier to last longer and likelier to advance the humanity further.

But the XKCD ♥♥♥♥♥♥ Randall Munroe intentionally decides do interpret the right to free speech as if it was just about the 1st amendment. Why?

It also means that we have to listen to one another. Obviously, calling what others say ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ straight up doesn't help with clarifying the thing, it's just a dishonest trick here.

Suppose that 2 persons have a conflict. As simple as to who eats the last piece of ice cream. Or who is the real author of the EndChainsawDebuff function. Or how do we interpret KF2 EULA. Or any other conflict of which we have tons. There are 2 ways to resolve such conflicts.

1. One party dismisses the rights of another party and suppresses their rights.
2. They HAVE to listen to their "♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥", or arguments. And find middle ground.

The first way has at least two downsides. It fails to advance humanity further, especially if the argument of the suppressed party was even a little bit more correct than the argument of the suppressing party. It also leads eventually to the accumulation of injustice and eventual violence in an attempt to right the wrongs.

Basically, if we want to resolve the conflicts peacefully and to the benefit of all the conflicting parties, find a middle ground, we HAVE to listen to each other's ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥.

So, again, Randall lies here. Why?

Then, yes, the 1st amendment doesn't shield us from the criticism and consequences. Because the ♥♥♥♥♥♥ started with their deception of framing the right to free speech as narrow as just the 1st amendment, we already know this statement is also deceptive, as its founded on deceptive premises. Then, why mixing consequences and criticism? Criticism is perfectly fine and is a RIGHT way to exercise the freedom of speech rights. We can criticize Tripwire. Tripwire can criticize our criticisms. Theoretically, if done in good faith, this leads to finding the middle ground and settling the conflict.

But why bringing up the "consequences"? Like, when muslims shoot people dead in the center of Paris for Mohammad's cartoons, as an example. Does this Randall ♥♥♥♥♥♥ hint that it's the consequences he welcomes?

Then, if you are being boycotted, your show cancelled, or you are banned from the internet community, your free speech rights ARE violated. Absolutely and unambiguously. But, we already know, that by relying on this deceptive flipping trick, the ♥♥♥♥♥♥ substituted the right to free speech with the 1st amendment, which isn't violated in this case, if the government isn't involved.

And finally, if the people deem you an ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ and use it as grounds to violate your free speech rights, it keeps being a violation of free speech rights.

Basically, in the end, this whole XKCD comic is a lie. One deception on another. Why is this Randall ♥♥♥♥♥♥ like that?

Some honest anon on the internet recognized all that long time ago and made absolutely right and necessary corrections to this comic:

https://steamproxy.net/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=3485960393

Here's how Randall Munroe looks like BTW:

https://steamproxy.net/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=3485926837

https://steamproxy.net/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=3485927039

And the answer why xe lies is pretty predictable, even tiresome. Being a libtard ♥♥♥♥♥♥ xe has to rely on lies to justify xis political takes. One of the most foundational libtard lies that lasts from its inception up to this date is the lie about equality of humans, e.g. no differences between different races or ethnic groups or subspecies, no differences between men and women, no differences between different strata in the same ethnic group and so on. If these takes are faced with adversity, with criticism, they fall apart. The only way one can prolong the lies and prevent them from being destroyed is to suppress truth and censor it, which is what xe does.

From here it's also clear why Yoshiro lies and brings up this comic. Yoshiro relies on someone else's lies to justify xis own lies. All these type of people lie all the time and refer to each others lies. In soviet union this was called "круговая порука" which can loosely be translated as "joint liability".

Xis other retarded takes you may find interesting:

https://steamproxy.net/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=3485928579

https://steamproxy.net/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=3485929121

https://steamproxy.net/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=3485932319

Important quote from Thomas Jefferson:

https://steamproxy.net/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=3485933824

Foundational essay on it from J. S. Mill:

https://www.utilitarianism.com/ol/two.html

Overall this topic is huge both in complexity and its impact on human lives and can be talked about almost endlessly. Not with people like Yoshiro, obviously. The ♥♥♥♥♥♥ is irredeemable.

But, to support the free speech, I'd like to explicitly declare that a free speech apologist like myself is open to discuss anything. If the ♥♥♥♥♥♥ ever finds his previously non-existent balls and chin, we can discuss if the way he banned this poor RS2 player justified and RS2 EULA actually provides for it.

No different with the Tamari drama. I always was open to discuss any findings and any implications. Predictably and inevitably ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ like Tamari choose not to. They can thrive only in the atmosphere of censorship and lies that cannot be questioned and swift bans are practiced as "consequences" LMAO for any exercise of one's free speech rights. Pathetic.