Steam 설치
로그인
|
언어
简体中文(중국어 간체)
繁體中文(중국어 번체)
日本語(일본어)
ไทย(태국어)
Български(불가리아어)
Čeština(체코어)
Dansk(덴마크어)
Deutsch(독일어)
English(영어)
Español - España(스페인어 - 스페인)
Español - Latinoamérica(스페인어 - 중남미)
Ελληνικά(그리스어)
Français(프랑스어)
Italiano(이탈리아어)
Bahasa Indonesia(인도네시아어)
Magyar(헝가리어)
Nederlands(네덜란드어)
Norsk(노르웨이어)
Polski(폴란드어)
Português(포르투갈어 - 포르투갈)
Português - Brasil(포르투갈어 - 브라질)
Română(루마니아어)
Русский(러시아어)
Suomi(핀란드어)
Svenska(스웨덴어)
Türkçe(튀르키예어)
Tiếng Việt(베트남어)
Українська(우크라이나어)
번역 관련 문제 보고
Brunelleschi, build after study the Pantheon of Roma (Rome), the almost old similar structure of the world, in stone and roman concrete.
anybody else got this mistake?
Compare to Taj Mahal: 50 less production, and instead of 4 happiness you recieve 3 more static culture and +1 culture per citizen. This is essentially trading 4 happiness for 15-25 extra culture for 50 less production (and this number will only grow to 30-40+ over time, and can grow to obscene proportions via percentage modifiers).
Obviously this wonder screams tradition/vertical empires, but even for them it seems... Tweaked.
My preliminary suggestion is to cut the golden age, or nerf static culture to +1 and change to +1 culture per 2 population, but I'll play with this first before making any affirmative suggestions.