Последние обзоры Dont be Silly Wrap your Willy

This game is what could most accurately be described as festival of visual diarrhea. Sounds a bit harsh, i know , but man does it give you a headache.

There are fewer than 5 puzzle throughout whole game and only one of them which does require you to actually use your noggin a bit , so this is in all it's essence a walking simulator pretending to be a game.

Ghost of a Tale is one of the most charming little games i've played in a while ,and even though you play as a little mouse , by calling it little i don't want to belittle it whatsoever.... well that was a mouthful.

This game is 'little' not because it is very short or there's a lack of content, it is 'little' because of the homey feeling it gives of. A lot of different things contribute to invoking that feeling . Art style is cozy and nice, soundscape as well. Overall theme of being a little mouse trying to sneak around giant rats you can't defeat works towards that as well.

But the main thing which makes this game so special for me is that sense of adventure and being lost in a best possible way. This will sound strange perhaps but Ghost of a Tale is first game since i've played Dark Souls back in early 2010's which gives me that adventurous sense of being lost and slowly but surely piecing layout,story and everything else together. It is a strange comparison to make i guess, but the feeling is that exact feeling i got from the DS back in a day.

Where two games are really very different is that Ghost of a Tale essentially has no combat hence you are a little mouse set against giant armored rats (imagine vermintide ) . Gameplay evolves around stealth and various tools to help you out. And that , sadly , is the weakest part of the game. It is extremely easy to be honest. There are save points literally every 10 steps and even if you get noticed you can easily run away from the danger because your assailants are not too keen on chasing you around for too long.

There are couple of nice touches like day and night cycle and certain npcs will or wont be in a place depending on time of day. I havent encountered any serious technical issues besides very little stuff, game is an Indie one so there's a lack of polish here and there but nothing to take away from the experience as well.

Overall a game for ones soul if you will. Strongly recommend for 'vibes' as kids say these days.

I have quite mixed feelings about Nioh 2.

On one hand i really do enjoy it. It has such a pleasant combat loop , probably one of the best out there. There's plenty of content,build variety,decent sound and visual design. Cherry on top is a very robust PC port which is a not a given these days anymore. Besides having to do a single adjustment outside what is expected i had no issues whatsoever and game optimization is top notch.

On other hand... Nioh 2 is epitome of too much of a good stuff. It is severely bloated with very weak story to tie it all up. There's so much recycled content here. They even recycled content from a first game which wouldnt be so bad but with previously mentioned already recycled stuff feels cheap to say the least. There's like 20 hours of actual content here and then 80 more of pretty much just replaying stuff. Nioh 1 had that too but in a completely separate end game section which was optional.

Anyways i do like it , i also can easily recommend it but at the same time what could have been an exceptional game , one of the best in souls-like is merely a good game. Which is a shame.

Wow... i cant remember when it was last time i was so disappointed in a game.

Coming hot after just finishing TEW 1 and absolutely loving it i was so hyped to play second one but somehow it manages to take everything first one did so well and throw it away just to replace it with generic semi open world,crafting,clunky controls,broken stealth,dialogue trees...

I dont know what happened behind the scenes, maybe TEW 1 didint sell well enough , maybe something else but man did they delt this game rough. Yeah TEW 1 had some issues, but it was solid, well paced, tighly crafted survival horror experience while TEW2 is some Ass Creed wannabe sabotaging absolutely everything first game built upon.

A massive let down.

Introduced microtransactions ( thing which dev said will never happen ) and broke server browser in same update so you cant play anymore.


Disaster.

Unplayable due to constant crashing.

CS:GO ran like butter.

Hello there , please treat what follows less as a review but more as just couple of scattered thoughts i have about this game.

When RE 3 Remake came out it had this cloud of negativity . A lot of people claimed that it fails to live up to expectations set by RE 2 Remake , and they were right. This is no RE 2 Remake. I'm by no means expert or a seasoned RE player, i only got into franchise recently but after playing RE HD Remake,RE 2 Remake and RE Revelations i can safely say that RE 3 Remake is a RE-lite.

I cant compare it to the original 'cause i have never played it but Remake is a way more linear and action focused than RE 2 Remake was. It is still a very enjoyable game with high production values,smooth gameplay,perfect performance and everything like that , but it is way simpler and easier than RE2 Rem was. Is it good or bad? I can't say. What i can say that even though it is third installment ( chronologically , if we speak about main line ) it seems like a good entry point for people because it sort of touches of what real survival horror looks like , without pulling all the weight of it on you directly.

I do like it. It is way less stressful experience than RE 2 Remake was. But it also lacks that impact RE2 had. It is like lower stakes lower reward situation.

All in all , enjoyable time but i can also see why a lot of people didint love it too much. If you are after that pure survival horror thrill , this is not it.

Baldur's Gate 3 is simply amazing game. There are plenty of reviews which is praising it to high heavens and they all correct. Yes there are couple of bugs here and there, but for a game of this scope that is absolutely understandable. I'm really happy to see how much hype this game got because for once game actually managed to deliver on it. Only partially objective criticism i've seen was that it feels more like Divinity Original Sin 3 than Baldur's Gate 3 , but for someone who absolutely loved DoS 1 and 2 that is exactly what doctor ordered.

But more importantly than how good of a game it is , is that it is a giant middle finger to whole modern gaming industry. And judging from launch numbers people really appreciated what Larian Studios did here. I could never imagine that turn based deep RPG will see almost 1 million players on launch, but here we are and we are better for it! Long live Larian, long live actually good video games.

Horizon Zero Dawn is definition of DULL. Not BAD mind you , just good ol' plain DULL.

After roughly 25 hours in i feel like i have exhausted everything mechanically and gameplay wise this game has to offer and while visually this game still makes me stop and admire the view once in a while i see how inherent shallowness of whole experience is starting to set in.

I've chosen to play on 'Very Hard' which keeps the combat section of game pretty tense and kind of carries it on , because you pretty much just die in a single hit , which in turn makes one think, strategise , and in general take most fights as serious as one for the end game boss. That whole thing would be great ( and can be great at times ) if not for honestly quite wonky hitboxes and teleporty behaviour of enemies. Invisible walls around objects ( for example you cant send arrow in between two poles a meter apart because there's invisible wall there ) limits you in using your enviroment as a tool in combat. Getting constantly stuck on objects and dieing because you couldnt roll out of the way is also a big headache.

Games does run , sound and feel quite good. I had 100+ fps on 1440p everything absolutely cracked on quite modest RTX 3070 / R5 7600 combo. Occasional hard crash to desktop , but overall a quality PC port.

Worldbuilding,story and writting in general borders on cringe. I'm just probably spoiled by RDR2, Witcher 3 and others but HZD felt... stupid? I mean it has a good setting , i was interested in what has happened to the world, but NPCs , main character , side characters just feel plastic. In more than one way. It felt so videogamey , it is hard to describe.

This is Ubisoft game not made by Ubisoft in conclusion. Just checklist of accepted openworld things to be included in game the video game. Is it bad? Nah. I will probably slowly grind at it , because it is never offensively bad or anything , it is just so .. uninspired ,you know?

It's not a Dirt Rally but it is also better than contemporary Need for Speed games.

Lasagna with spinach out of 10.