Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
In a modern nuclear reactor, a powerful electromagnet keeps several carbon rods suspended above slots in the reactor. Should the energy feed to the magnet fluctuate FOR ANY REASON, it shuts down and the rods IMMEDIATELY slide into the reactor, shutting down the reaction and requiring a MANUAL RESTART.
Contrast with the Enterprise, where the Matter/Antimatter feed responsible for the ship exploding was IMPOSSIBLE TO SHUT DOWN ON MULTIPLE OCCASIONS. I DON'T CARE HOW MUCH OUTPUT IS NEEDED, YOU DO NOT DESIGN A REACTOR TO BE EASY TO START BUT HARD TO STOP UNLESS YOU ARE A COMPLETE AND TOTAL