Установить Steam
войти
|
язык
简体中文 (упрощенный китайский)
繁體中文 (традиционный китайский)
日本語 (японский)
한국어 (корейский)
ไทย (тайский)
Български (болгарский)
Čeština (чешский)
Dansk (датский)
Deutsch (немецкий)
English (английский)
Español - España (испанский)
Español - Latinoamérica (латиноам. испанский)
Ελληνικά (греческий)
Français (французский)
Italiano (итальянский)
Bahasa Indonesia (индонезийский)
Magyar (венгерский)
Nederlands (нидерландский)
Norsk (норвежский)
Polski (польский)
Português (португальский)
Português-Brasil (бразильский португальский)
Română (румынский)
Suomi (финский)
Svenska (шведский)
Türkçe (турецкий)
Tiếng Việt (вьетнамский)
Українська (украинский)
Сообщить о проблеме с переводом
In a modern nuclear reactor, a powerful electromagnet keeps several carbon rods suspended above slots in the reactor. Should the energy feed to the magnet fluctuate FOR ANY REASON, it shuts down and the rods IMMEDIATELY slide into the reactor, shutting down the reaction and requiring a MANUAL RESTART.
Contrast with the Enterprise, where the Matter/Antimatter feed responsible for the ship exploding was IMPOSSIBLE TO SHUT DOWN ON MULTIPLE OCCASIONS. I DON'T CARE HOW MUCH OUTPUT IS NEEDED, YOU DO NOT DESIGN A REACTOR TO BE EASY TO START BUT HARD TO STOP UNLESS YOU ARE A COMPLETE AND TOTAL