Recent reviews by Bari.exe is out of memory

There's some flaws like loading screens, the quest design/main story has not improved since skyrim (And Skyrim's wasn't even that great to begin with), and empty planets is a problem ( Procedural generation doesn't help.), though i think the problem more or less lies in what to do on a planet in general. Like even on a Full Planet, like those forest planets that aren't dead rocks (Moons), there should be more to it then just gathering, mining, killing, looking for dungeons and radiant quests.

With that said, what Starfield gets right is sticking to the old formula that Bethesda knows best, but not shying away from adding tiny, yet worthwhile upgrades and quality of life features from their other games. Such pretty much run for a bit while encumbered like in F076. Or the Quick climb feature from DOOM (2016), and so on. And personally, i think the facial animations while talking, while uncanny, is certainly better then say Fallout 4. The Lockpick minigame is kind of engaging, the Ship building is pretty good, the combat is so much improved from Fo4 (though still not where it SHOULD be imo.), And it still gives the Bethesda open world awe feel to it. And the Side Content is always more engaging then the main story. Albeit a bit disjointed and kind of shallow at times, like i wish there's more to the gangs of Neon City for one.

And i think that's the problem with the kind of genre Bethesda was going for here. It's much harder to fill with content when you have 1000's of maps to do essentially. That and.. Despite being pretty stable, it still somehow gets buggier each time they give their game a go. I've literally taken pieces of New Antlantis with me and those pieces are just straight up gone in my save. Actual holes on the map there.

And Bethesda's attitude towards negative reviews just screams misunderstanding the room, because they only look at the game as the spectacle of going to space as if were really going there, instead of what we all see: Bethesda open world RPG, but set in space. It rubs me the wrong way.

Anyways, Simply put, Starfield is just Fallout 4++ in space.

I do love Starfield, but i don't recommend buying it for $70. I only recommend you wait until a huge sale, or play it on Gamepass. I don't guarantee mods will save this game because i'm also one of those people who think Bethesda should've just knocked it out of the park from the get go, and not just do decently.

Not only my childhood games are on PC now with beautiful HD graphics and (mostly) butter smooth 60 fps, it surprisingly plays well with a Mouse and Keyboard.

However, there are some complaints i have that hopefully Activision would fix, or until theirs a modding scene. Some of the issues do make bits of Year of the Dragon unplayible.
• The Camera feels unresponsive and slow with the mouse. I had to crank it up to 90 and it still feels sluggish, though i was able to make due with it.
• Swimming and Flying Inertia is pretty irksome, especially in speedway levels and ESPECIALLY in races.

The action button thing was fixed as soon i get to Enchanted Towers. I don't know if this was intentional to disable the flips and spins until i get there or if it's a bug.

All and All, i recommend this Game if you haven't played it yet or never played Spyro before. Also Pro Tip: Turn Motion Blur off immediately.

Ehh.. It's pretty decent and kinda feels like one of those old school 3d first person shooters, with the "new generation" touch up.

One Tip: don't rely the plants to conceal you. They don't conceal you like in Far cry 3 and upwards.

I never knew how much i wanted to parkour and drop kick zombies off a building until i got this game.

Never tried multiplayer, but i would honestly recommend it just for single-player alone, Just don't expect a good story thou.

The story is slightly better then the base game's, the hives doesn't really change up the formua too much of the quarantine zones like "kill all the infected" or "collect x amount of y", but still a load of fun, the new zombos like the giant version of zombies (or Freaks of Nature according to the Dying light wiki) is pretty inventive (given this game) and pretty much out there, and the countryside is a nice change of pace from your cities.

As for the car, its a serious mixed bag.

Pros:
- It does have skills, and upgrading parts will make it perform better.
- a fun mindless zombie crusher,
- atfer the learning curve, can be fun to drive around in.
- made bombers less annoying if you ram into them, cause i guess your buggy shields you from that. somehow.
- Nitro :D

Cons:
- a minor gripe i have with the countyside is theirs a heck of lot of unuseible cars, and you can only fix up and drive a buggy?
- not all that useful driving if theirs an aIrdrop during the day. espicaly if you have the grappling hook, unless your really good at it.
- really not reccomended for out-driving zombies at night unless your really skilled at it.
- minor gripe again, While parts of your car do break and you can run out of fuel, you still take damage weather a zombie hits you. just slightly less. i guess that does make sense since you're in a buggy.
- Freaking indestructible trees. No small trees should be this strong.
- minor gripe once again, When a Volatile hits you, it spins your buggy around.
- and most of all, you can't Shoot with your guns on the car like you can in other first person open world shooters (i.e. Far cry), making Chasing bolters down an honest drag. you have weapons on your car you can install, but i'm talking but if you have a pistol, but you can't use it while in the car.

its fun, if you already like Dying light and want more of it, this one is right up your alley.

I got to say, the concept for a survival/crafting game is orginal and refreshing for the genre, the dinosaurs are pretty cool, and the content on offer here is pretty dang solid, even for a base game. This would've been a steal for 30 or 20 bucks. 10 year old me would play the crap out of this back in the day.

But 60 bucks is questionible for a game that came out with early access and.. certainlly plays like it. Don't get me wrong, it's a great fun game, but coupled with some of the issues that looked like it haven't been ironed out (mostly talking about the noodle physics coapses do sometimes and the feeling of not being well optimized), with some shaky history of releasing an expansion while making the game, and not to mention, 60 bucks right now, has put pay to my reluctance to recommend it at it's full price.

I recommend only to grab it on sale, you'll be happier when you do.

Best 1000 hours i ever spend on.

ehh you know what, despite being a very old game, its many performance and gameplay flaws, and that take two took openIV once upon a time but rockstar got them to back off, i'm sorry, but this game kicks serious a**.

this you don't need to be Online to play it solo, nor you need the soical club, and it works a hella better then anything else.

welp, bought the game, went to sandbox mode, punch though a horde of zombies, found the maintainmece room, made a nail bat, guitar weapon, paddle saw... etc. found a pyschopath, tried to kill him, got killed myself and lost 5 hours of progress cause i didn't find the bathroom.

though i was a little put off from the story mode, excluvisely due to the timers (Wondering if everything ticks down in real time??).

8/10 better game then DR4. ^_^

*sigh*...

the best thing that can be said about this game is at least it takes less trouble to downgrade it to mod it then gta 5...