Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
That being said I think it needs to be changed from all armies to Imrik's army.
Compared to factions that can flatly field more armies than you could ever manage with Imrik, isn't it fine for his stacks to be stronger than Tyrion or Alarielle's equivalents? Two out of three bonuses are situational asf, and you are not getting full set until turn 80~.
Gordinar's Fury: 10% move speed for everyone
(NO flaming attacks, otherwise at this point regenerating units become unusable for other factions against you)
Ymwrath's Temper: +15% magic resistance
Bruwor's Instinct: +5 Melee armor piercing damage, +15% Missile armor piercing damage
Lamoureux's Blood: +5% Phys Resistance, -20% Vigour loss
Shackolot's Intangibility: -30% damage from Attrition, Attribute: causes fear
the original buffs were never intended to stack in any way, so they are strong on their own. having them stack for all eternity basically means you are playing on easy.