Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
But I agree that it is weird that battlepods take room in this version... I know in MOO2 they didn't actually cost too much and took no room up themselves. They were amazing lol
i love making overpowerd ships and the AI dont even use those pods anyway
Hyper-X-Capacitators are quite highly regarded as one of the best specials and likely the fourth most used special after battle pods, heavy armor, and reinforced hull.
The Hyper-X takes up 160 space on a titan. Titans have 1400 hull space. They'll use up about 700 for shields and engines. That leaves 700 for other systems. If you use even 320 of that space for energy weapons then the Hyper-X saves are much space as it uses. Any more and it's all profit. The Hyper-X uses half as much space on each successive step down in hull size and thus requires half as many energy weapons to break even and stard profiting in space.
No sir, the Hyper-X is quite good as it is.
I suspect it is because that Specials also reduce in size as you advance in tech (thus improving the cost/space benefit equation). I have no idea myself how this functions if this is true.
Nice option but I think it is unecessary. If however you were to rebalance Hyper-X-Capacitors (which operate similarly but have a very bad cost/benefit), I think that would be a reasonable option.