Space Engineers

Space Engineers

33 ratings
Hawk Atmospheric Fighter - Wing Reliant Design
   
Award
Favorite
Favorited
Unfavorite
Type: Blueprint
File Size
Posted
263.730 KB
21 Feb, 2016 @ 1:01pm
1 Change Note ( view )

Subscribe to download
Hawk Atmospheric Fighter - Wing Reliant Design

Description
Pretty simple little plane, setup as a light attack craft with 6 gatlings and 2 reloadable rocket launchers. Handles nicely thanks to the large forwards thrust and large wingspan.

HAS NO LANDING GEAR! SEE THE VIDEO FOR WHY AND FEEL FREE TO ADD YOUR OWN :)

Fully survival ready!

Many thanks to Digi for his continued efforts to make amazing mods!

The blueprint to accompany the attached video from my YouTube channel!

Stream: http://www.hitbox.tv/w4stedspace

If you found this interesting or helpful please consider visting my YouTube channel for more Space Engineers tutorials, guides and videos.

http://www.youtube.com/w4stedspace

I also have a Steam group:
just w4sted space
7 Comments
Dovahkiir 29 Feb, 2016 @ 1:55pm 
W4sted, why not use the mag lock mod as you dont need to touch, go in low and slow enoughto be in proximity and lock, they also dont affect aerodunamics. Awesome design
Comrade w4sted  [author] 28 Feb, 2016 @ 10:05am 
You only have 3 models of wing to play with so incorporating them can be a bit weird.. in this case though it was an intentional choice, looks more 'plane' like this way I thought. Means the other more crazy ones I make look more different :)
Janixos 26 Feb, 2016 @ 12:20pm 
Nice fighter :D
I don´t like the way how you dealt with the large Atmospheric thrusters. Wouldn´t it look better, if you integrate them into the wings? It could make a smaller profile. At the end of each wing you could install 3 small Atmo-Thrusters instead of the large ones.

ROFLwafles 25 Feb, 2016 @ 9:53pm 
Tell me I'm not the only one who read the thumbnail " Hawk as f*** "
Eclipse Tech 22 Feb, 2016 @ 1:10pm 
I thought this looked familiar, then I looked at who made it... I was not disappointed.
xenolego 21 Feb, 2016 @ 6:07pm 
Completely wild!
Comrade w4sted  [author] 21 Feb, 2016 @ 5:46pm 
I like that reverse-thinking :) Same sorta approach that led me to this thought! No idea if it'd work, not sure if rotors have enough 'give' in them to absorb the impact