安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
They are only powerful with a lot of players. Railroads cost $200. To break even, each one would have to be passed over (or landed on) 8 times by other players.
In a 2-player game - this is incredibly unlikely - especially because it may be 2 or 3 trips around the board before you land on one to buy it. You'd only have 1 person paying you each go around. So it would take 8 trips for the player to even make your money back. Only by the 9th trip are you making a profit.
In a 5-player game, (meaning 4 other players paying you) this will happen in 2 trips around the board for everyone before you saw a profit.
Honestly, I think they are a bad investment. In the original game, you could make them profitable if you owned all 4. ("Take a Ride on the Reading" cards added value.) In this version, since the rent's $25 for each RR no matter how many you own, (right?) buying them is a loss. It *is* guarenteed income but it takes too long to become profitable.
This would be an interesting variant on the mega monopoly set, as eliminating the corners would shrink the board slightly and make the game go a little quicker.