Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I use quotation marks up there because you are right in that is the least convincing future earth layout I've seen. Pole shift doesn't work like that. Tectonics doesn't work like that. Mountain ranges don't just pop up on new continents. If continents form in places where there's deep ocean today (Atlantic - that is not the Mid-Atlantic-Ridge there -, Pacific) the geological changes would have to be so catastrophic that literally any random scribbling of continents holds more credibility than one still based on today's. (Actually not entirely true, it holds the same)
All that being said, this is about the map for gameplay.