Infinifactory

Infinifactory

99 个评价
More Advanced Logic (Hard)
   
奖励
收藏
已收藏
取消收藏
文件大小
发表于
476.026 KB
2015 年 1 月 21 日 下午 11:31
1 项改动说明 ( 查看 )

订阅以下载
More Advanced Logic (Hard)

在 Synthesis 的 1 个合集中
Levels By Synthesis
3 件物品
描述
Another level with simple output but an awesome factory needed to create it.
80 条留言
Sanian 2023 年 6 月 16 日 上午 8:34 
Loved this puzzle! I think I was able to come up with a really well-rounded solution that's small, simple and fast for its size.

257/51/42

https://imgur.com/hmzMkmr
https://imgur.com/a69pdqv
https://imgur.com/lzXPvmH
https://imgur.com/tNMCBi7
huetobi 2019 年 11 月 19 日 下午 2:01 
My Solution:
177/121/97 https://i.imgur.com/SKZP8Mh.gif
Lazergurka 2019 年 10 月 12 日 上午 8:20 
strange, I don't get it downloaded onto my computer
a_snowball 2019 年 3 月 12 日 下午 1:46 
Got 15 footprint, which is the theorical minimum. Only took like three iterations of the same idea ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

GIF: https://i.imgur.com/lUE5TbW.gifv
Dr. Walrus 2019 年 3 月 2 日 下午 11:03 
I'm almost certain this is the fastest solution possible. The interval between outputs is 12 cycles, which is limited by how fast you can use the stamper. The output block is moved as quickly as possible into position over the stamper, stamped 4 times, then directly moved next to the output by welding to a Giant Rotating Arm and then rotating the block to the next position to take only 1 cycle per movement.

127 cycles (infinite solution)

https://i.imgur.com/SklSaKO.gif
Dr. Walrus 2019 年 2 月 25 日 下午 10:19 
I think I'm done for a while. I'm not sure if you can get 129 cycles and I think 128 is the fastest you could get if you had lots more space. This is 132 /363/317

https://i.imgur.com/VuYMXD5.gifv
https://i.imgur.com/rtlfOrR.gifv
Dr. Walrus 2019 年 2 月 23 日 下午 11:17 
I'm getting around to doing some of the classic user generated puzzles. This is my best effort for speed before i saw some other designs and realized that you can just rotate directly over the hole.

https://i.imgur.com/4fd6GzE.gifv 338/269/272

ebik 2018 年 9 月 22 日 下午 4:56 
@Hypnotic: I guess you can rotate faster, the 60 cycles should be 2 cycles per rotation. You lose one cycle for moving rotator in and one for moving it out. If the rotator will be lifted up and down instead, then it can move down with the holder saving one cycle per rotation. I guess that the other cycle can be optimised only by paralelism - while one holder moves in, the other moves out of the stamping machine, utilizing it for full theoretical speed (one cycle in/out, one down, one up, that gives theoretical minimum of 120 cycles).
ziotron 2017 年 6 月 19 日 上午 2:43 
This puzzle was so amazingly satisfying to solve.
JReesW 2017 年 3 月 26 日 上午 11:37 
I can;t believe I actually solved this one, took me long enough tho. 5 stars definitely:conveyorblock::lifterblock::pusherblock: