Infinifactory

Infinifactory

99 ratings
More Advanced Logic (Hard)
   
Award
Favorite
Favorited
Unfavorite
File Size
Posted
476.026 KB
21 Jan, 2015 @ 11:31pm
1 Change Note ( view )

Subscribe to download
More Advanced Logic (Hard)

In 1 collection by Synthesis
Levels By Synthesis
3 items
Description
Another level with simple output but an awesome factory needed to create it.
80 Comments
Sanian 16 Jun, 2023 @ 8:34am 
Loved this puzzle! I think I was able to come up with a really well-rounded solution that's small, simple and fast for its size.

257/51/42

https://imgur.com/hmzMkmr
https://imgur.com/a69pdqv
https://imgur.com/lzXPvmH
https://imgur.com/tNMCBi7
huetobi 19 Nov, 2019 @ 2:01pm 
My Solution:
177/121/97 https://i.imgur.com/SKZP8Mh.gif
Lazergurka 12 Oct, 2019 @ 8:20am 
strange, I don't get it downloaded onto my computer
a_snowball 12 Mar, 2019 @ 1:46pm 
Got 15 footprint, which is the theorical minimum. Only took like three iterations of the same idea ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

GIF: https://i.imgur.com/lUE5TbW.gifv
Dr. Walrus 2 Mar, 2019 @ 11:03pm 
I'm almost certain this is the fastest solution possible. The interval between outputs is 12 cycles, which is limited by how fast you can use the stamper. The output block is moved as quickly as possible into position over the stamper, stamped 4 times, then directly moved next to the output by welding to a Giant Rotating Arm and then rotating the block to the next position to take only 1 cycle per movement.

127 cycles (infinite solution)

https://i.imgur.com/SklSaKO.gif
Dr. Walrus 25 Feb, 2019 @ 10:19pm 
I think I'm done for a while. I'm not sure if you can get 129 cycles and I think 128 is the fastest you could get if you had lots more space. This is 132 /363/317

https://i.imgur.com/VuYMXD5.gifv
https://i.imgur.com/rtlfOrR.gifv
Dr. Walrus 23 Feb, 2019 @ 11:17pm 
I'm getting around to doing some of the classic user generated puzzles. This is my best effort for speed before i saw some other designs and realized that you can just rotate directly over the hole.

https://i.imgur.com/4fd6GzE.gifv 338/269/272

ebik 22 Sep, 2018 @ 4:56pm 
@Hypnotic: I guess you can rotate faster, the 60 cycles should be 2 cycles per rotation. You lose one cycle for moving rotator in and one for moving it out. If the rotator will be lifted up and down instead, then it can move down with the holder saving one cycle per rotation. I guess that the other cycle can be optimised only by paralelism - while one holder moves in, the other moves out of the stamping machine, utilizing it for full theoretical speed (one cycle in/out, one down, one up, that gives theoretical minimum of 120 cycles).
ziotron 19 Jun, 2017 @ 2:43am 
This puzzle was so amazingly satisfying to solve.
JReesW 26 Mar, 2017 @ 11:37am 
I can;t believe I actually solved this one, took me long enough tho. 5 stars definitely:conveyorblock::lifterblock::pusherblock: