Infinifactory
99 valoraciones
More Advanced Logic (Hard)
   
Premio
Favoritos
Favorito
Quitar
Tamaño
Publicado el
476.026 KB
21 ENE 2015 a las 11:31 p. m.
1 nota sobre cambios ( ver )

Suscríbete para descargar
More Advanced Logic (Hard)

En 1 colección creada por Synthesis
Levels By Synthesis
3 artículos
Descripción
Another level with simple output but an awesome factory needed to create it.
80 comentarios
Sanian 16 JUN 2023 a las 8:34 a. m. 
Loved this puzzle! I think I was able to come up with a really well-rounded solution that's small, simple and fast for its size.

257/51/42

https://imgur.com/hmzMkmr
https://imgur.com/a69pdqv
https://imgur.com/lzXPvmH
https://imgur.com/tNMCBi7
huetobi 19 NOV 2019 a las 2:01 p. m. 
My Solution:
177/121/97 https://i.imgur.com/SKZP8Mh.gif
Lazergurka 12 OCT 2019 a las 8:20 a. m. 
strange, I don't get it downloaded onto my computer
a_snowball 12 MAR 2019 a las 1:46 p. m. 
Got 15 footprint, which is the theorical minimum. Only took like three iterations of the same idea ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

GIF: https://i.imgur.com/lUE5TbW.gifv
Dr. Walrus 2 MAR 2019 a las 11:03 p. m. 
I'm almost certain this is the fastest solution possible. The interval between outputs is 12 cycles, which is limited by how fast you can use the stamper. The output block is moved as quickly as possible into position over the stamper, stamped 4 times, then directly moved next to the output by welding to a Giant Rotating Arm and then rotating the block to the next position to take only 1 cycle per movement.

127 cycles (infinite solution)

https://i.imgur.com/SklSaKO.gif
Dr. Walrus 25 FEB 2019 a las 10:19 p. m. 
I think I'm done for a while. I'm not sure if you can get 129 cycles and I think 128 is the fastest you could get if you had lots more space. This is 132 /363/317

https://i.imgur.com/VuYMXD5.gifv
https://i.imgur.com/rtlfOrR.gifv
Dr. Walrus 23 FEB 2019 a las 11:17 p. m. 
I'm getting around to doing some of the classic user generated puzzles. This is my best effort for speed before i saw some other designs and realized that you can just rotate directly over the hole.

https://i.imgur.com/4fd6GzE.gifv 338/269/272

ebik 22 SEP 2018 a las 4:56 p. m. 
@Hypnotic: I guess you can rotate faster, the 60 cycles should be 2 cycles per rotation. You lose one cycle for moving rotator in and one for moving it out. If the rotator will be lifted up and down instead, then it can move down with the holder saving one cycle per rotation. I guess that the other cycle can be optimised only by paralelism - while one holder moves in, the other moves out of the stamping machine, utilizing it for full theoretical speed (one cycle in/out, one down, one up, that gives theoretical minimum of 120 cycles).
ziotron 19 JUN 2017 a las 2:43 a. m. 
This puzzle was so amazingly satisfying to solve.
JReesW 26 MAR 2017 a las 11:37 a. m. 
I can;t believe I actually solved this one, took me long enough tho. 5 stars definitely:conveyorblock::lifterblock::pusherblock: