Infinifactory

Infinifactory

99 평점
More Advanced Logic (Hard)
   
어워드
즐겨찾기
즐겨찾기됨
즐겨찾기 해제
파일 크기
게시일
476.026 KB
2015년 1월 21일 오후 11시 31분
1개의 변경 사항 ( 보기 )

다운로드 위해 구독하기
More Advanced Logic (Hard)

Synthesis님의 1 모음집
Levels By Synthesis
아이템 3개
설명
Another level with simple output but an awesome factory needed to create it.
댓글 80
Sanian 2023년 6월 16일 오전 8시 34분 
Loved this puzzle! I think I was able to come up with a really well-rounded solution that's small, simple and fast for its size.

257/51/42

https://imgur.com/hmzMkmr
https://imgur.com/a69pdqv
https://imgur.com/lzXPvmH
https://imgur.com/tNMCBi7
huetobi 2019년 11월 19일 오후 2시 01분 
My Solution:
177/121/97 https://i.imgur.com/SKZP8Mh.gif
Lazergurka 2019년 10월 12일 오전 8시 20분 
strange, I don't get it downloaded onto my computer
a_snowball 2019년 3월 12일 오후 1시 46분 
Got 15 footprint, which is the theorical minimum. Only took like three iterations of the same idea ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

GIF: https://i.imgur.com/lUE5TbW.gifv
Dr. Walrus 2019년 3월 2일 오후 11시 03분 
I'm almost certain this is the fastest solution possible. The interval between outputs is 12 cycles, which is limited by how fast you can use the stamper. The output block is moved as quickly as possible into position over the stamper, stamped 4 times, then directly moved next to the output by welding to a Giant Rotating Arm and then rotating the block to the next position to take only 1 cycle per movement.

127 cycles (infinite solution)

https://i.imgur.com/SklSaKO.gif
Dr. Walrus 2019년 2월 25일 오후 10시 19분 
I think I'm done for a while. I'm not sure if you can get 129 cycles and I think 128 is the fastest you could get if you had lots more space. This is 132 /363/317

https://i.imgur.com/VuYMXD5.gifv
https://i.imgur.com/rtlfOrR.gifv
Dr. Walrus 2019년 2월 23일 오후 11시 17분 
I'm getting around to doing some of the classic user generated puzzles. This is my best effort for speed before i saw some other designs and realized that you can just rotate directly over the hole.

https://i.imgur.com/4fd6GzE.gifv 338/269/272

ebik 2018년 9월 22일 오후 4시 56분 
@Hypnotic: I guess you can rotate faster, the 60 cycles should be 2 cycles per rotation. You lose one cycle for moving rotator in and one for moving it out. If the rotator will be lifted up and down instead, then it can move down with the holder saving one cycle per rotation. I guess that the other cycle can be optimised only by paralelism - while one holder moves in, the other moves out of the stamping machine, utilizing it for full theoretical speed (one cycle in/out, one down, one up, that gives theoretical minimum of 120 cycles).
ziotron 2017년 6월 19일 오전 2시 43분 
This puzzle was so amazingly satisfying to solve.
JReesW 2017년 3월 26일 오전 11시 37분 
I can;t believe I actually solved this one, took me long enough tho. 5 stars definitely:conveyorblock::lifterblock::pusherblock: