Infinifactory

Infinifactory

99 人が評価
More Advanced Logic (Hard)
   
アワード
お気に入り
お気に入り
お気に入りから削除
ファイルサイズ
投稿日
476.026 KB
2015年1月21日 23時31分
1 項目の変更履歴 ( 表示 )

サブスクライブしてダウンロード
More Advanced Logic (Hard)

Synthesis 作成の 1 件のコレクション
Levels By Synthesis
3 アイテム
解説
Another level with simple output but an awesome factory needed to create it.
80 件のコメント
Sanian 2023年6月16日 8時34分 
Loved this puzzle! I think I was able to come up with a really well-rounded solution that's small, simple and fast for its size.

257/51/42

https://imgur.com/hmzMkmr
https://imgur.com/a69pdqv
https://imgur.com/lzXPvmH
https://imgur.com/tNMCBi7
huetobi 2019年11月19日 14時01分 
My Solution:
177/121/97 https://i.imgur.com/SKZP8Mh.gif
Lazergurka 2019年10月12日 8時20分 
strange, I don't get it downloaded onto my computer
a_snowball 2019年3月12日 13時46分 
Got 15 footprint, which is the theorical minimum. Only took like three iterations of the same idea ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

GIF: https://i.imgur.com/lUE5TbW.gifv
Dr. Walrus 2019年3月2日 23時03分 
I'm almost certain this is the fastest solution possible. The interval between outputs is 12 cycles, which is limited by how fast you can use the stamper. The output block is moved as quickly as possible into position over the stamper, stamped 4 times, then directly moved next to the output by welding to a Giant Rotating Arm and then rotating the block to the next position to take only 1 cycle per movement.

127 cycles (infinite solution)

https://i.imgur.com/SklSaKO.gif
Dr. Walrus 2019年2月25日 22時19分 
I think I'm done for a while. I'm not sure if you can get 129 cycles and I think 128 is the fastest you could get if you had lots more space. This is 132 /363/317

https://i.imgur.com/VuYMXD5.gifv
https://i.imgur.com/rtlfOrR.gifv
Dr. Walrus 2019年2月23日 23時17分 
I'm getting around to doing some of the classic user generated puzzles. This is my best effort for speed before i saw some other designs and realized that you can just rotate directly over the hole.

https://i.imgur.com/4fd6GzE.gifv 338/269/272

ebik 2018年9月22日 16時56分 
@Hypnotic: I guess you can rotate faster, the 60 cycles should be 2 cycles per rotation. You lose one cycle for moving rotator in and one for moving it out. If the rotator will be lifted up and down instead, then it can move down with the holder saving one cycle per rotation. I guess that the other cycle can be optimised only by paralelism - while one holder moves in, the other moves out of the stamping machine, utilizing it for full theoretical speed (one cycle in/out, one down, one up, that gives theoretical minimum of 120 cycles).
ziotron 2017年6月19日 2時43分 
This puzzle was so amazingly satisfying to solve.
JReesW 2017年3月26日 11時37分 
I can;t believe I actually solved this one, took me long enough tho. 5 stars definitely:conveyorblock::lifterblock::pusherblock: