Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Historians are asked above all for objectivity, and rigor to understand the facts, not to judge them.
If you want to know something, it's better to turn to serious studies (and recognized as such) carried out by specialized authors.
Moreover, errors, repeated tens or hundreds of thousands of times, and such as this appears as the result of a search query on Internet, don't give a single truth ...
But this is a helmet created and manufactured by an English firm, Vickers ...
Moreover, part of Ireland was occupied (even annexed) by the English Army, which could encourage to turn to one of his opponents. The English Army occupied other territories around the world (and practiced the same methods of repression there), where the same mechanism worked.
Isn't that what the Jewish Agency did, in the person of Haim Arlosoroff ?
Nice !