Steamをインストール
ログイン
|
言語
简体中文(簡体字中国語)
繁體中文(繁体字中国語)
한국어 (韓国語)
ไทย (タイ語)
български (ブルガリア語)
Čeština(チェコ語)
Dansk (デンマーク語)
Deutsch (ドイツ語)
English (英語)
Español - España (スペイン語 - スペイン)
Español - Latinoamérica (スペイン語 - ラテンアメリカ)
Ελληνικά (ギリシャ語)
Français (フランス語)
Italiano (イタリア語)
Bahasa Indonesia(インドネシア語)
Magyar(ハンガリー語)
Nederlands (オランダ語)
Norsk (ノルウェー語)
Polski (ポーランド語)
Português(ポルトガル語-ポルトガル)
Português - Brasil (ポルトガル語 - ブラジル)
Română(ルーマニア語)
Русский (ロシア語)
Suomi (フィンランド語)
Svenska (スウェーデン語)
Türkçe (トルコ語)
Tiếng Việt (ベトナム語)
Українська (ウクライナ語)
翻訳の問題を報告
For now beds connected to nutrient paste network via connectors are producing "DietTracker:: Variety reason mismatch
UnityEngine.StackTraceUtility:ExtractStackTrace ()" error
Their concept on variety is kinda similar to here, but is simpler and straight forward; as example, this mod also considers pawns expactions and VE version don't;
This mod also has code to improve pawns micromanagement; they will intercalate between ingredients when available; VE version don't, you have to micromanage yourself.
This mod has the same and more tweaking options than VE.
The only thing VE has that this mod doesn't is pawns favorite ingredients, and also is more performance friendly.
To be clear, this is not a way to say one mod is better than the other, I just wanted to highlight their differences in hopes that people are aware of what this mod does and also hoping it doesn't get deprecated in favor of VE. As others said, their concept doesn't appeal to everybody, and I would like to keep using this one if possible.