Steam installieren
Anmelden
|
Sprache
简体中文 (Vereinfachtes Chinesisch)
繁體中文 (Traditionelles Chinesisch)
日本語 (Japanisch)
한국어 (Koreanisch)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarisch)
Čeština (Tschechisch)
Dansk (Dänisch)
English (Englisch)
Español – España (Spanisch – Spanien)
Español – Latinoamérica (Lateinamerikanisches Spanisch)
Ελληνικά (Griechisch)
Français (Französisch)
Italiano (Italienisch)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesisch)
Magyar (Ungarisch)
Nederlands (Niederländisch)
Norsk (Norwegisch)
Polski (Polnisch)
Português – Portugal (Portugiesisch – Portugal)
Português – Brasil (Portugiesisch – Brasilien)
Română (Rumänisch)
Русский (Russisch)
Suomi (Finnisch)
Svenska (Schwedisch)
Türkçe (Türkisch)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamesisch)
Українська (Ukrainisch)
Ein Übersetzungsproblem melden
Yes tomb kings need a DLC or two. They are so barebones and they need a spellcaster lord.
I don't know, I feel that Lizardmen has a lot going for them. But maybe I need another play with them. Their roster is incredibly extensive and there's about a faction to specialize in any of them. I feel that in regards to WH2 there was no faction who got more love than lizards with so many playable lords and units.
Again, I might need to give them a try again. I know Hexoatl and Kroq-gar are a bit lackluster but Nakai and Oxyotl has a huge playstyle difference.
As regarding Khalida, I feel all tomb kings suffer from the same lack of interest imo.
Other than that, if you are taking suggestions for other factions, I think that there are quite a few that fit the profile explained above: Changing some stats and making something stronger, but not as drastically or simply not the stats that truly change the feel of campaign. Some also just change the units you are should be recruiting, which does change the battle-feel of the faction, but campaign is left identical, which doesn't feel right imo.
Of the top of my head I can think of Khalida, Ungrim and Kholek, but I'm sure there are much more of them.