Установить Steam
войти
|
язык
简体中文 (упрощенный китайский)
繁體中文 (традиционный китайский)
日本語 (японский)
한국어 (корейский)
ไทย (тайский)
Български (болгарский)
Čeština (чешский)
Dansk (датский)
Deutsch (немецкий)
English (английский)
Español - España (испанский)
Español - Latinoamérica (латиноам. испанский)
Ελληνικά (греческий)
Français (французский)
Italiano (итальянский)
Bahasa Indonesia (индонезийский)
Magyar (венгерский)
Nederlands (нидерландский)
Norsk (норвежский)
Polski (польский)
Português (португальский)
Português-Brasil (бразильский португальский)
Română (румынский)
Suomi (финский)
Svenska (шведский)
Türkçe (турецкий)
Tiếng Việt (вьетнамский)
Українська (украинский)
Сообщить о проблеме с переводом
Also, on further study of the chassis, a decoy could be fit in towards the mid-rear near the side thrusters, assuming that enemy fire kicks in around 1km-800m, and the missile is travelling at >200m/s, that should buy the warheads enough time to hit past enemy counter fire, while possibly sacrificing it's maneuverability.
If the counter fire shears the missile in two, at least the warhead part would impact the target at high velocity, rather than losing the warhead section.
However it does make it more expensive and weighted.
Sub-grids - none on the missile itself