Steam telepítése
belépés
|
nyelv
简体中文 (egyszerűsített kínai)
繁體中文 (hagyományos kínai)
日本語 (japán)
한국어 (koreai)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bolgár)
Čeština (cseh)
Dansk (dán)
Deutsch (német)
English (angol)
Español - España (spanyolországi spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (latin-amerikai spanyol)
Ελληνικά (görög)
Français (francia)
Italiano (olasz)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonéz)
Nederlands (holland)
Norsk (norvég)
Polski (lengyel)
Português (portugáliai portugál)
Português - Brasil (brazíliai portugál)
Română (román)
Русский (orosz)
Suomi (finn)
Svenska (svéd)
Türkçe (török)
Tiếng Việt (vietnámi)
Українська (ukrán)
Fordítási probléma jelentése
Also, on further study of the chassis, a decoy could be fit in towards the mid-rear near the side thrusters, assuming that enemy fire kicks in around 1km-800m, and the missile is travelling at >200m/s, that should buy the warheads enough time to hit past enemy counter fire, while possibly sacrificing it's maneuverability.
If the counter fire shears the missile in two, at least the warhead part would impact the target at high velocity, rather than losing the warhead section.
However it does make it more expensive and weighted.
Sub-grids - none on the missile itself