安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題
https://gist.github.com/HugsLibRecordKeeper/eb18e5ce4be8049c34e839f0a26420be
For example, your and vanilla animal naming is American instead of European way (moose instead of elk, elk instead of wapiti, cheetah instead of gepard, cougar instead of puma). I would edit the names if it was a feature. Someone might have other reasons to edit names.
Instead Indian elephant, Asian elephant would make more sense: it includes also the Indian elephant.
I settled by a lake, and about 30% of the map is water and sand. Offering nothing. Some fish would be good, salmon in rivers, waterfowl, crabs, something that makes any sense to settle by beach.
Does a river btw add some animals that otherwise wouldn't be on the local map? Like beaver, hippo, alligator?
New animals? As there are megasloths in vanilla how about recently died animals, like mammoth, woolly rhino, terror bird, cave lion, sabre-toothed cat (smilodon)?