Steam 설치
로그인
|
언어
简体中文(중국어 간체)
繁體中文(중국어 번체)
日本語(일본어)
ไทย(태국어)
Български(불가리아어)
Čeština(체코어)
Dansk(덴마크어)
Deutsch(독일어)
English(영어)
Español - España(스페인어 - 스페인)
Español - Latinoamérica(스페인어 - 중남미)
Ελληνικά(그리스어)
Français(프랑스어)
Italiano(이탈리아어)
Bahasa Indonesia(인도네시아어)
Magyar(헝가리어)
Nederlands(네덜란드어)
Norsk(노르웨이어)
Polski(폴란드어)
Português(포르투갈어 - 포르투갈)
Português - Brasil(포르투갈어 - 브라질)
Română(루마니아어)
Русский(러시아어)
Suomi(핀란드어)
Svenska(스웨덴어)
Türkçe(튀르키예어)
Tiếng Việt(베트남어)
Українська(우크라이나어)
번역 관련 문제 보고
Very fitting,considering Emerl's history. Thanks for the answers, Vorbis.
That being said, yes, the scaling damage was an intentional interaction; in his game of origin, Emerl began to self destruct from having too powerful of an attack copied. So the scaling cost of having a bunch of cards copied is meant to play into that.
2) Also in Emerl's game of origin, a lot of Emerl's inherent moves were made to be bad. Like, you can copy other people's things, so your own are much worse to encourage patching them with other moves. That's why Strange Teachers waits an entire round to do anything; it's made to be intentionally slower than most 'destroy a thing' powers.
Questions
1) I was going over Uncontainable Destruction and I'm now curious about the end of turn effect.
As written, "Emerl deals himself X+1 fixed Lightning damage. If no Damage is taken this way, destroy this card."
Fixed Damage means it cant' be redirected or reduced so the only way to trigger the "no damage taken" clause is with Damage prevention, given Damage Immunity cards can no longer be copied.
Self-Damage Prevention is pretty rare. So, unless you have ongoing destruction or consistent damage prevention available from one of your teammates, you are going be hit for damage every turn, with said damage increasing in scale the more you play into the deck's record mechanic.
Was this interaction intentional?