Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I suspect one of the problems in the early days of creating, folks would create scenario's and leave the percentage (player train) at default 75%. (and some put it up to 100% :( )Then if it was only 1 mile between stops they would always fail as they could not get to line speed of 90/100mph and stop at the station.
Quite rightly lots of peeps got miffed!
Especially as some of them were " Career Scenario's" with points stats going begging!
That is why Chris and I, in freight scenario's, just put passing times.
We all drive differently:)
As an aside, I am working on a real life loco that ran from Sheperdswell as an engineering train about 3 months ago on the Dover Chatham etc. I do hope you do not beat me to it!!!!!!!!
Have a great one NS.
All the best
Nat
I read your comments regarding 'timetabled' passenger trains with interest. Only in the last few weeks I have created timetabled 'Standard' scenarios. I have finally figured out how to get timings that work. They seem to be doing OK, and I haven't had any negative feedback yet. They are all on one of the Chatham Main line routes. Just thought I would let you know. I will be doing more, now I know they are accepted.
Many thanks for playing the scenario and for the very thoughtful comments.
As far as having an operational timetabled run is concerned this is something that divides opinions. Some like it and some don't which it is why Nat and I give suggested times in the F1 task list when necessary. Re the difficulty level we did say in the description notes above that the Difficulty level is "Medium".
Very glad you enjoyed playing the scenario and that everything worked for you.
Best regards
Chris and Nat
However it would be nice if there was an Operational Timetable (like the type you get on realtime trains), although as this was not a schduled passenger train it isn't a neccesity, and you did provide a suggested Timetable. Based on the description and the difficulty level I had expected a few more adverse signals and perhaps a slower passenger train instead. In terms of difficulty I found it Medium.
Despite this (I always try and cover both sides when doing a review) without hesitation I would still give this scenario 5*.
Thank you very much
All the best
Nat & Chris
Very well done!! Glad it was finally successful!
Best regards
Chris and Nat
Many thanks for playing the scenario and for commenting. Very pleased you enjoyed it.
Best regards
Chris and Nat
Many thanks for playing the scenario and for commenting, Very pleased you enjoyed it.
Best regards
Chris and Nat