Instal Steam
login
|
bahasa
简体中文 (Tionghoa Sederhana)
繁體中文 (Tionghoa Tradisional)
日本語 (Bahasa Jepang)
한국어 (Bahasa Korea)
ไทย (Bahasa Thai)
Български (Bahasa Bulgaria)
Čeština (Bahasa Ceko)
Dansk (Bahasa Denmark)
Deutsch (Bahasa Jerman)
English (Bahasa Inggris)
Español - España (Bahasa Spanyol - Spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (Bahasa Spanyol - Amerika Latin)
Ελληνικά (Bahasa Yunani)
Français (Bahasa Prancis)
Italiano (Bahasa Italia)
Magyar (Bahasa Hungaria)
Nederlands (Bahasa Belanda)
Norsk (Bahasa Norwegia)
Polski (Bahasa Polandia)
Português (Portugis - Portugal)
Português-Brasil (Bahasa Portugis-Brasil)
Română (Bahasa Rumania)
Русский (Bahasa Rusia)
Suomi (Bahasa Finlandia)
Svenska (Bahasa Swedia)
Türkçe (Bahasa Turki)
Tiếng Việt (Bahasa Vietnam)
Українська (Bahasa Ukraina)
Laporkan kesalahan penerjemahan
For example for clergy to get in power there'd need to be an ideological shift towards religious ethical values combined with an overall shift towards importance of ethical ideals over political and material.
For capitalists to utterly dominate like they do nowadays we'd need a joke of a political structure (yes, I'm looking at YOU, modern democracy), and almost non-existent focus on ethical ideals (I don't even have to comment on this part do I?).
Any ideology that ignores at least ONE of those stances is at best half-assed and at worst just plain fake.
there are 3 types of stances that define society's live.
Ethical ideals. (religious included here)
Political structural ideals.
Material structural ideals.
All 3 are part on an ideology.
Saying “simply methods of running a political system” is immaturely dismissive of you.