Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
For example for clergy to get in power there'd need to be an ideological shift towards religious ethical values combined with an overall shift towards importance of ethical ideals over political and material.
For capitalists to utterly dominate like they do nowadays we'd need a joke of a political structure (yes, I'm looking at YOU, modern democracy), and almost non-existent focus on ethical ideals (I don't even have to comment on this part do I?).
Any ideology that ignores at least ONE of those stances is at best half-assed and at worst just plain fake.
there are 3 types of stances that define society's live.
Ethical ideals. (religious included here)
Political structural ideals.
Material structural ideals.
All 3 are part on an ideology.
Saying “simply methods of running a political system” is immaturely dismissive of you.