Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Though if we were to put modern leaders on it... Mullah Mohammed Omar would have been nice, oh well.
You should have put Ahmad Shah Durrani, and his Afghan empire. He was also in control of the military of the persian empire until it fell. He created a pretty big empire, making that the highest and most glorious period of the Afghan people.
Maybe you could, or someone else could, make another mod with him.
I don't know why mrktucson is saying they don't want to take Afghanistan, when they do. It has the most tactical position: Russia to the north, China to the north-east, Pakistan and its nukes to the east, Iran and their half completed nukes the west and Khazakhstan to the north east. Afghanistan borders Iran and Turkmenistan, the second and third largest oil reserves in the world. Now tell me, do you really think America would turn their back on that?