Recent reviews by Source

ok good

good

yes

Played 21 hours during the many playtests and enjoyed my time and bought it this morning. Has 127v127, 64v64, and 32v32 modes with plenty of maps, vehicles, and helicopters. not everything is destructible but a lot is. its chaos, you will die a lot but its fun. The new map is great and the gunplay and movement is great. if you like FPS you should buy this game despite the low poly graphics.

good

Game is good. And im sure it will get better.

There is a lot of salty old players from verdun that are upset that the devs pursued this game instead of updating a 7 year old dead game (which can barely pass 200 concurrent players in a givin day). And tannenburg (which is also dead and can barely pass 100 concurent players in a day). They claim it is "splitting" a non existent community across 3 games. while this one already has more players than tannenburg ever had and rapidly approaching the max that verdun had. This is the best looking and feeling game from this ww1 series. dont listen to a bunch of old heads upset that the gaming world has moved on.

Maps for the most part are good (dolomiti is straight trash tho for attackers) and its really is an updated version of verdun if you run in the open like a ♥♥♥♥♥♥ or not follow the momentum of a full team push then you probably wont like it. you will die a lot more on attacking side and you need the officer call ins to win. this is not COD but it is a casual twitch shooter.

more free to play hero shooter trash. stupid map design. dumbass abilities same old ♥♥♥♥ we've seen in gaming for the past 4 years

yes

yes