The score for this game need not hinge on whether it's an asset flip or not. It's junk, no matter the legitimacy of its creation. There's barely a demo here, sincerely.

I keep seeing this notion bandied about that it could be a game for children. People who say this must be calculating solely on the metric of the game's difficulty (a near zero save for a few bad platforming sections that might frustrate a child) - they probably don't have children and otherwise vastly underestimate them. Young kids in fact need BETTER stimulation to keep their young attention spans, not lazy crap. They won't care about the abstracted value that it could be someone's first game, for example. How an 18 minute playthrough managed to be insufferably repetitive is one for the scholars, but I was bored as a patient adult. Why would a child then find this thrilling?

I'm not going to bother reviewing the technical aspects, barely there as they are.

The score for this game need not hinge on whether it's an asset flip or not. It's junk, no matter the legitimacy of its creation. There's barely a demo here, sincerely. I keep seeing this notion bandied about that it could be a game for children. People who say this must be calculating solely on the metric of the game's difficulty (a near zero save for a few bad platforming sections that might frustrate a child) - they probably don't have children and otherwise vastly underestimate them. Young kids in fact need BETTER stimulation to keep their young attention spans, not lazy crap. They won't care about the abstracted value that it could be someone's first game, for example. How an 18 minute playthrough managed to be insufferably repetitive is one for the scholars, but I was bored as a patient adult. Why would a child then find this thrilling? I'm not going to bother reviewing the technical aspects, barely there as they are.