No one has rated this review as helpful yet
Not Recommended
1.4 hrs last two weeks / 1,458.5 hrs on record (229.3 hrs at review time)
Posted: 8 Jul, 2021 @ 1:37am
Updated: 25 Mar, 2023 @ 1:58am

As a normal player, I, on behalf of all of the affected players, denounce this update. We find it UNACCEPTABLE, because it simultaneously undermines both of the killers’ and survivors’ game experience, which may lead to irreversible consequences.I have been playing this game for 2 years. Admittedly, some skills which affect the game balance should be altered and optimized, but it does not mean polarization. Let me give some examples:DEAD HARD(survivor)ERUPTION(killer)This change could make games more fast-paced and less entertaining. If you want to win, the killer tends to choose specific strategy, such as camp or channel, and the survivor refuses to gamble with killer. This situation definitely is contrary to the original purpose of the game.Fair play should be the ultimate goal and pursuit. we encourage the more diversified choices for survivors and killers and hope a healthier gaming environment. It is obvious that the competition between killer and the survivor should be a positive sum game, not a zero-sum game.We highly demand you can re-evaluate the feasibility of this plan and put forward some alternative proposals that satisfy both killers and survivors. Please listen to players’ advice, don’t’ bury your head in the sand, IT’S AN ELEPHANT IN THE ROOM.
Was this review helpful? Yes No Funny Award
1 Comments
积极养阳德 8 Jul, 2021 @ 4:46am 
玩某抄袭手游后你可能会觉得杀机的判定是真j8好:sacrificed: