Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Imagine we had coh1 matchmaking (whose algorithm was pretty crap tbh) and it was team vs team only... you would have like 30+ minutes queue time as team of 3 or 4
And one day Chicago, you will have good random ranks as well... if I go check the ladders, I see a lot people who did the impossible and reached top 100.... 100 people to be precise :D
why not do a review for the game what you are supposed to do and add bad/unfair matchmaking as a contra to a great game?