105
Arvostellut
tuotteet
349
Tuotetta
käyttäjätilillä

Käyttäjän Denny Crane viimeaikaiset arvostelut

< 1 ... 4  5  6  7  8 ... 11 >
Näytetään 51–60 / 105
3 henkilön mielestä arvostelu on hyödyllinen
yhteensä 24.3 tuntia (4.0 tuntia arvostelun laatimishetkellä)
Denny Crane here. I enjoy these zombies video games. Specially when I am the one controlling the zombies. In this case I am creating and watching the mayham play out. A lot of poeple will complain that this video game is too hard. Or that it isn't worth its value. Those are the Liberals and Democrats wanting a free ride. How could this video game be any cheaper without being free?
You create zombies, you customize your attack loadout and you kill people. Sounds like a Rambo movie, except Rambo is dropping zombies into populated areas. You blow things up, melt people and kill creative parodies of current pop culture. Buy this video game. Denny Crane.
Julkaistu 10. toukokuuta 2018
Oliko arvostelu hyödyllinen? Kyllä Ei Hauska Palkinto
10 henkilön mielestä arvostelu on hyödyllinen
3 käyttäjän mielestä tämä arviointi oli hauska
yhteensä 449.9 tuntia (428.3 tuntia arvostelun laatimishetkellä)
Denny Crane here. I will now explain my negative recommendation:
1. There is a phrase going around in the video game world (parents' basement), "pay to win." This means that you pay REAL money to improve the numbers and powers that make up your character. THIS video game has that. I may be rich but I didn't get rich by being stupid and spending my real money on fake things.
2. There is nothing to "win." What makes no senes to me is, if you are going to have a "pay to win" approach to your video game have something to win. Secret World Legends is a VERY empty video game. Sure it looks good, but if you pay for a meal and I bring you an empty decorative plate, you have no reason to stay at my establishment.
3. The story may be good, but the writing is derivative and lazy. How is it a well educated professor and an uneducated homemaker have the same vocabulary? The homemaker claims her idea of culture is reruns of "Cheers" or even the "TV Guide." So how is it she laments at a college grade level? How is it EVERY character you talk to does the same? The only ones that stand out are the children, but even their dialog sounds no different from each other kid.
Is this a bad video game? No. It is just a desperate cash grab for a dying video game. It IS dying and this puts it on life support. What this is is just an EMPTY video game. Played purly for the nostagia; and since I never played the first iteration I'm already bored.
I wish to make an addendum. In a video game where you can get a blow job from an Asian chick, take drugs, and cussing is everywhere, why did I get banned for saying a cuss word? Hypocrisy is the first step in the Liberal/Democrat/Socialist agenda in censorship and bringing down the fabric of a free country.
Julkaistu 26. huhtikuuta 2018 Viimeksi muokattu 22. elokuuta 2018.
Oliko arvostelu hyödyllinen? Kyllä Ei Hauska Palkinto
Yhden henkilön mielestä arvostelu on hyödyllinen
11 käyttäjän mielestä tämä arviointi oli hauska
yhteensä 96.0 tuntia (31.3 tuntia arvostelun laatimishetkellä)
What should have been a fun successor to the Plants VS Zombies video game of the first, comes a video game that relies too much now on the random chance approach. Where your victories and losses are NOT determined by your own skills but by the roll of a dice. This is a growing trend from the Liberal-Left that cannot take responsibility for themselves so program their video games so you have no control.
Video games are played to practice and achieve via your hard work and skill. Now-a-days, video games seem to be relying more on random chance approch under the guise of playing. Think of it like gambling but with the illusion of control instead of honestly telling you you have no control.
Julkaistu 13. maaliskuuta 2018
Oliko arvostelu hyödyllinen? Kyllä Ei Hauska Palkinto
Kukaan ei ole vielä merkinnyt tätä arviota hyödylliseksi
yhteensä 320.2 tuntia (18.8 tuntia arvostelun laatimishetkellä)
Upon further review of this video game I am forced to change my review from a positive standing to negative. It is unfortunate but it is a necessary step to take, as all steps of righteous and good. I've noticed a trend that I think is actually culture. Suffering. The masochists. A growing trend in video games. Impossible scenarios until you stumble upon a card or trinket that ALLOWS you to progress. It is an illusion of a video game, and only an exercise in suffering to give another illusion of purpose in life.
There are fat nerds and other such losers that have no purpose. Sometimes their God-give purpose is to pump my gas but they turn their backs on said purpose. So as they wallow in their self imposed misery, they convince themselves their suffering is a source of joy. This leads them to find other sources of suffering to compound their joy. Enter video games with no actual skill required except one's tolerance for pain.
It is this philosophy that drives this video game. The player cannot win until they have suffered enough. I am no masochist and now that I see how this video game works, I refuse to participate. I'm taking myself off the wrack where once I was blind. Don't put yourself on it. Denny Crane.
Julkaistu 28. helmikuuta 2018 Viimeksi muokattu 10. marraskuuta 2023.
Oliko arvostelu hyödyllinen? Kyllä Ei Hauska Palkinto
3 henkilön mielestä arvostelu on hyödyllinen
3 käyttäjän mielestä tämä arviointi oli hauska
yhteensä 64.6 tuntia (34.3 tuntia arvostelun laatimishetkellä)
You get to run around shooting hippies, ACTUAL hippies. I mean, they call them "Rebels" but what's the actual difference? They're dirty, ignorant, vote Democrat, AND they want to censor free speach. Shoot hippies (Rebels) and engage in fast paced battles. Denny Crane.
Julkaistu 24. marraskuuta 2017
Oliko arvostelu hyödyllinen? Kyllä Ei Hauska Palkinto
16 henkilön mielestä arvostelu on hyödyllinen
6 käyttäjän mielestä tämä arviointi oli hauska
yhteensä 253.2 tuntia (210.7 tuntia arvostelun laatimishetkellä)
Denny Crane here, and I cannot recommend this video game. Here are the reasons. These reasons will also stand for the first three versions of this one video game and shall be posted accordingly.
1. Sloppy copy and paste approach. The took the first three video games and just combined them "loosely" into one giant video game. The problem is, they changed a few things, but at the same time, left other things in that have zero affect upon this version itself that affected the original three chapters.
2. Your ghost lady companion is designed only half a-s-s-e-d. First, she stops gaining new levels after 60, which quickly makes her become obsolete later in the video game. She also has a tendency to just stop attacking enemies as if nothing is wrong. This makes certain parts almost impossible to complete unless the video game "decides" she should attack again.
3. When you design a mode of the video game that is only beatable by cheating, that is a bad design choice. There is a mode called "Hardcore." In this mode, if you die, the whole video game is over. You have to start fresh, anew, creating a whole new character. My office IT guy showed me away around this so that I can bypass the limitation. But that still means the only way to beat this mode is to cheat. There are COUNTLESS times when a simple swipe or random chance that kills your guy with one hit. Can you imagine being so far into this video game, only to HAVE to start all over again?
4. Spelling errors. I know this video game was not made in the good ol' US of A, however if you are going write for a video game English, get someone who knows how to read. There is a series of clothes that are named "Wicth Hunter..." and every time I read that, my head hurt.
5. The items in this video game do NOT scale well as you get further into the video game. Eventually, you just are unable to find anything that is better than what you are wearing... when you still have a 3rd of the video game to play. This could be off set if your ghost lady companion would still level up.
6. The same button to move your character is the same to attack. So when you are trying to attack something, you accidently run towards it and get yourself killed (have to start all over again). That is a terrible choice for controls.
This video game does have some nice things to it but not enough to make up for the frustrating playthrough. I will be posting this review on the other three versions seeing as they are just 1/3 of the same thing.
Julkaistu 15. syyskuuta 2017
Oliko arvostelu hyödyllinen? Kyllä Ei Hauska Palkinto
Steamin moderaattori on kieltänyt arvostelun, koska se rikkoo Steamin käyttöehtoja. Arvostelun laatija ei voi muokata tekstiään.
5 henkilön mielestä arvostelu on hyödyllinen
7 käyttäjän mielestä tämä arviointi oli hauska
yhteensä 711.3 tuntia (9.6 tuntia arvostelun laatimishetkellä)
(Arvostelun teksti on piilotettu)
Julkaistu 26. toukokuuta 2017
Oliko arvostelu hyödyllinen? Kyllä Ei Hauska Palkinto
Yhden henkilön mielestä arvostelu on hyödyllinen
Yhden henkilön mielestä arvostelu on hauska
yhteensä 10.3 tuntia
This is the weaker of the two video games in the series but not by much. A unique feature of looking through the lens becomes a source of detachment unfortunately. Attempting to build from the first, this entry only creates bland attempts. With all that said, it was still a fun video game. This isn't "hillbillies" but just a secluded town. There are some negative things to say but Denny Crane knows when something is worth the price. This is.
Julkaistu 27. huhtikuuta 2017
Oliko arvostelu hyödyllinen? Kyllä Ei Hauska Palkinto
18 henkilön mielestä arvostelu on hyödyllinen
14 käyttäjän mielestä tämä arviointi oli hauska
yhteensä 335.7 tuntia (84.5 tuntia arvostelun laatimishetkellä)
What was supposed to be a new kind of Orcs Must Die (OMD) turned into a watered down half-assed Orcs Must Die 3 (OMD3). Orcs Must Die: Unchained (OMDU) was supposed to be a new kind of OMD in the franchise. Player VS Player (PVP) was the original game model. The "Unchained" were the Orcs now led by a new high queen reinvading yet again. But this time you could play for the other side - Good VS Evil. Some namby-pambies said they thought PVP was too mean and not hippie enough so PVP was removed. This collapsed the whole model. Now Good and Evil were fighting along side each other against their own minions?
The worst part was what replaced PVP at release (with no way to critique, because critiquing is mean apparently) - Sabotage. In today's society, children are being raised by children. Sissies and Democrats are overcrowding the streets leaving no room for development but instead leads to regression. Sabotage is the most passive-agressive mode one can play. Instead of looking a man in the (digital) eye as you attack him, you just chose some randomly chosen ways to hinder the enemy team, without ever actually confronting your opponent. Confrontation is being taken out because people are getting more and more sensitive. We wouldn't want to hurt their feelings (video game developers and players alike). Do not play this video game. Just play the first two (OMD and OMD2). Hell, 2 has a co op feature for the main story.
Julkaistu 18. huhtikuuta 2017 Viimeksi muokattu 19. huhtikuuta 2017.
Oliko arvostelu hyödyllinen? Kyllä Ei Hauska Palkinto
Kukaan ei ole vielä merkinnyt tätä arviota hyödylliseksi
Yhden henkilön mielestä arvostelu on hauska
yhteensä 14.1 tuntia (11.9 tuntia arvostelun laatimishetkellä)
I don't understand the obsession with the Japanese culture. With that said, this was a fun little game. Fixing a broken system of society (Democrat majority) is what this video game is all about. A little too ♥♥♥ looking for my personal taste and the controls are a little awkward.
At first I gave this video game a negative review but after giving it another chance I am glad I did. Still don't like the ♥♥♥ look to it but it was fun and has potential for a sequel. Denny Crane.
Julkaistu 30. tammikuuta 2017 Viimeksi muokattu 26. heinäkuuta 2017.
Oliko arvostelu hyödyllinen? Kyllä Ei Hauska Palkinto
< 1 ... 4  5  6  7  8 ... 11 >
Näytetään 51–60 / 105