I feel like people are being a little harsh on this game. I haven't played the first game but i understand that missing an aspect from the first game that clearly did well should have been kept on the second game. "Don't fix what ain't broken" i get it. However while this aspect of the game (the feeling of loosing civilians) is not here in Frostpunk 2 it makes up for it dramatically for the amount of extra content this game provides. The game does so many other things better and it honestly shouldn't be negatively reviewed just because of that one missing feature in my opinion.

The art style, the graphics, the soundtrack are great and unique. Its a survival city builder and your decisions really affects the games outcome. The gameplay and mechanics are quite unique for this game i feel like it deserves a fair review. 8.5/10

I feel like people are being a little harsh on this game. I haven't played the first game but i understand that missing an aspect from the first game that clearly did well should have been kept on the second game. "Don't fix what ain't broken" i get it. However while this aspect of the game (the feeling of loosing civilians) is not here in Frostpunk 2 it makes up for it dramatically for the amount of extra content this game provides. The game does so many other things better and it honestly shouldn't be negatively reviewed just because of that one missing feature in my opinion. The art style, the graphics, the soundtrack are great and unique. Its a survival city builder and your decisions really affects the games outcome. The gameplay and mechanics are quite unique for this game i feel like it deserves a fair review. 8.5/10