Análises recentes de The Zilx

No game I'd recommend is pay to win.

Lots of shine to distract you from the lack of flavour. I won't lie, there's been quite a few imporovements since CK2, especially in visuals and ease of use. However, I cannot fathom why I must find a home to a child every single time I hold court, or why I get the same flavour events again and again.

This boggles the mind since flavour events could hypothetically be typed up in 10 minutes a piece. So why there's so few, when it seems to me that a week of the devs grinding could leave the game with hundreds if not thousands of flavour events, and things happening to your character, that doesn't make you feel like you're living the same life as a new character, repeating every event constantly.

It's a good game, but if I were to either have this game in its current state, or CK2 and not the other, I would choose CK2 and recommend it to others as well. That doesn't mean CK3 is a bad game, just that there's plenty of room for improvement.

Almost as good as Warband

Honestly, CA. Get your ♥♥♥♥ together.

Zero replayability, ♥♥♥♥♥♥ quests, etc., etc. The game achieves absolutely nothing that the old Fallout games did. It lacks diversity, and the flexibility of quests where you can take meaningful choices and impact the world.

The game is much less about roleplay than it is about just shooting things now.

Great political and historical game! One of the jewels from Paradox! a definite 8.5 out of 10!