13 people found this review helpful
7 people found this review funny
2
Not Recommended
0.0 hrs last two weeks / 65.4 hrs on record (64.9 hrs at review time)
Posted: 10 Dec, 2020 @ 10:04am
Updated: 6 Oct @ 12:27pm

I usually write well-detailed reviews for big games or games that simply amaze me, but since Cyberpunk 2077 is an unfinished, early-access game, it doesn't deserve anything more than a half-baked review.

I'll just list several aspects of the game and judge their quality.

Let's start with the pros.

Story - Good.

Music - Great.

Characters - Some of them forgettable, some very well-written.

That's about it, now the cons.

AI - Non-existent.

Driving - Terrible.

Gunplay - Underwhelming and incredibly boring.

Quests - Tedious.

Optimization - Horrid.

All in all, the game is obviously rushed and unpolished. The bugs and glitches and unfinished content is just the cherry on top of a mediocre at best game that barely accomplishes what it wants to be - an open world RPG. These elements are very mild, making the game an inferior version of any GTA or Saints Row. Even games that don't try to be an open world, for example Dishonored, reward the player for exploring much more than this mess of a game.

I would not recommend buying this game at all, unless the price point falls down all the way to ~10$, as it's just not that good as people claim it to be.

UPDATE:

Upon having had an influx of fans tell me that this game is "great now", I decided to give it a shot once again. Played a little bit, and discovered the following: This is perhaps, the most overrated game ever made. It's annoying fans constantly praise it, to the point of calling it "GOTY", but anyone would even a remotely decent taste in games (old and new) will know that it's literally the most "mid" game ever made. The sheer amount of wrong with this game is everything wrong with the industry itself. What a joke.
Was this review helpful? Yes No Funny Award
5 Comments
Davidov 24 Nov, 2022 @ 3:29pm 
bruv it's a 1050 Ti, and this "potato" can run Doom Eternal at near-max settings at 60fps.

Bad optimization is bad optimization. No need to lick the corpo peen.
Elevenz 24 Nov, 2022 @ 3:24pm 
bruv u have a laptop 1050 it is potato :narumi:
Davidov 6 Jan, 2021 @ 4:20am 
Part (2/2)


The checkpoints, as I mentioned, are pretty annoying and badly designed. Several times I have completed a mission (often times a very difficult one), just to enter another mission, get instantly killed by an explosion, load in the checkpoint and voila! I'm back at the start of the first mission. This has happened around 5 times now. It's especially frustrating when you get a rare weapon in that first mission, only for it to be reset because the game didn't think to save after you finish it.

I'm glad you enjoyed the game so much to give it another playthrough, but try to be objective and see from other players' perspective, the game has both pros and cons, however, I have experienced more of the latter.
Davidov 6 Jan, 2021 @ 4:19am 
Part (1/2)

My PC is far from a "Potato", it runs Doom Eternal on Ultra settings at a smooth 45+ FPS. I believe the reason people expect the game to, at least, have a consistent 60 FPS with the lowest settings is because this is exactly what you should expect from a well-designed, triple A game that took a long time and was delayed several times because they wanted to "polish" it and "give it finishing touches". Not everyone has double RTX GPUs in ther case, buddy. Most gamers have average or low-end rigs. Good optimization is certainly something we shouldn't take for granted anymore.
X 6 Jan, 2021 @ 4:09am 
its funny how people with potato PCs expect the new games to run perfectly smooth with high fps :SultonFace: I played the game through once already will do again the checkpoints dont really bother me dont see whats the problem with them? it does autosave after missions