Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I understand that the better players and the partners may be who they tend to listen to first. But when the majority is really against something, it no longer makes sense. The regular players and players lower on the leaderboard spend the same color money as everyone else. As do the viewers. It seems a little off to ignore them. Do those 'top tier' votes reflect the streamers view or their viewers view?
In the end, look at the drop in viewers and streamers. Betadwarf has also made major changes to the economy of the game so that they can finally make some well deserved money from it. Then what do they do? Chase all those potential or already spending Masters away with (it seems) not so well thought out moves like this.
~60% of players like Wild Cards" iirc there was no ' don't care' option. it is supposedly temporary , but for me wildcards arent the issue, it is that when my friends that i like to play with leave the game over it or other nerfs...