Asenna Steam
kirjaudu sisään
|
kieli
简体中文 (yksinkertaistettu kiina)
繁體中文 (perinteinen kiina)
日本語 (japani)
한국어 (korea)
ไทย (thai)
български (bulgaria)
Čeština (tšekki)
Dansk (tanska)
Deutsch (saksa)
English (englanti)
Español – España (espanja – Espanja)
Español – Latinoamérica (espanja – Lat. Am.)
Ελληνικά (kreikka)
Français (ranska)
Italiano (italia)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesia)
Magyar (unkari)
Nederlands (hollanti)
Norsk (norja)
Polski (puola)
Português (portugali – Portugali)
Português – Brasil (portugali – Brasilia)
Română (romania)
Русский (venäjä)
Svenska (ruotsi)
Türkçe (turkki)
Tiếng Việt (vietnam)
Українська (ukraina)
Ilmoita käännösongelmasta
2) Even if what you say is true (and it isn't), would an extremely bad gameplay mechanic in a predecessor excuse an extremely bad gameplay mechanic used in a future game? No, it would not.
If you would like a good example of a Oregon Trail-style parody, play the Organ Trail, also available on Steam. Organ Trail was rather faithful to the spirit of the Oregon Trail.
1) As someone who has actually played several versions of Oregon Trail, I can tell you that while there are a few elements of RNG there, they are, by far, not the entire game, as was Orion Trail. In Oregon Trail, for example, you can purchase supplies at many of the stops (including at the very beginning of the game), trade for them at all of them, hunt for food whenever you want, and choose how you want to deal with the rivers. You can, with skill and persistence, get the things you need. You also choose at the start your profession from a persistent list, which affects your starting money and skills, and choose when you start the trail, which affects how much time you have before Winter and possible hazards along the way. (cont)
Are you just incredibly stupid? What were you expecting, even?? I'm annoyed at blithering idiots like yourself, because you attack games for faults that are entirely your own.
Then I, and others, have to wade through this drivel.
Please don't post any more reviews. Thanks.