Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Answer: I still got it (if you know what i mean :3)
AMD is in the lead for GPUs now, and the gap between the two companies is picking up while the market is shrinking. You are seeing the end game for GPUs entering the final phases, and Nvidia still does not have a viable exit strategy. The loss of marketshare leadership, is a huge psychological blow, and combined with Nvidia failing to take back performance leadership for the second generation running, you can see the writing on the wall. Game over, at least for Nvidia GPUs
See link. Great analysis. Although I will say this. If you can pick up a Phenom II Quad core for 120 then I still might go AMD. Yet look at the link.. Great anlysis.
http://techreport.com/articles.x/21876
http://lenzfire.com/2011/07/bulldozer-sample-vs-core-i7-990x-in-sli-test/