Інсталювати Steam
увійти
|
мова
简体中文 (спрощена китайська)
繁體中文 (традиційна китайська)
日本語 (японська)
한국어 (корейська)
ไทย (тайська)
Български (болгарська)
Čeština (чеська)
Dansk (данська)
Deutsch (німецька)
English (англійська)
Español - España (іспанська — Іспанія)
Español - Latinoamérica (іспанська — Латинська Америка)
Ελληνικά (грецька)
Français (французька)
Italiano (італійська)
Bahasa Indonesia (індонезійська)
Magyar (угорська)
Nederlands (нідерландська)
Norsk (норвезька)
Polski (польська)
Português (португальська — Португалія)
Português - Brasil (португальська — Бразилія)
Română (румунська)
Русский (російська)
Suomi (фінська)
Svenska (шведська)
Türkçe (турецька)
Tiếng Việt (в’єтнамська)
Повідомити про проблему з перекладом
Wow, somebody care about this.
I have some plans for map with destruction with bfbc2 style. But i havent any time for doing that motivation and incentive to create a "masterpiece" which adapted to gmod.
It's not hard, it takes a lot of time. Especially when it comes to attracting third-party programs that will do everything for me (or without my participation) - it sounds cool, but in practice it doesn’t work like that. The Source engine is the only one I know where the system you just named is one whole and very painstaking and requires a special approach. This system should only be accessed through very old programs, which, by the way, I use - MilkShape 3D and kHED.
Another feature of the Source engine is the big difference between a physical model and a model that is pre-existing on a certain map - with the second I have more interaction options than with the first. Therefore, as I wrote above - I want to make the first map with destructibility like in good games. But it takes a lot of time, I have a life, job and so on.
Builded with toolgun will be literally bruh, real destructions gigachads want real shiеt like what can looks greate and very detailed