Nainstalovat Steam
přihlásit se
|
jazyk
简体中文 (Zjednodušená čínština)
繁體中文 (Tradiční čínština)
日本語 (Japonština)
한국어 (Korejština)
ไทย (Thajština)
български (Bulharština)
Dansk (Dánština)
Deutsch (Němčina)
English (Angličtina)
Español-España (Evropská španělština)
Español-Latinoamérica (Latin. španělština)
Ελληνικά (Řečtina)
Français (Francouzština)
Italiano (Italština)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonéština)
Magyar (Maďarština)
Nederlands (Nizozemština)
Norsk (Norština)
Polski (Polština)
Português (Evropská portugalština)
Português-Brasil (Brazilská portugalština)
Română (Rumunština)
Русский (Ruština)
Suomi (Finština)
Svenska (Švédština)
Türkçe (Turečtina)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamština)
Українська (Ukrajinština)
Nahlásit problém s překladem
The example that you gave goes to prove the incongruity of the names as they stand. There is a clear pattern that is being followed here, as opposed to a more abstract system of naming, and, as such, the most reasonable thing to do is to standardise word forms.
"We value prosperity tradition"
"We value mercantile tradition"
See? It's not just merely the same case, it's same freaking word in all of those cases.
Those are names, and names don't need to follow a single form, exactly because of the above reason - every name has an "eaten" word hiding in it's shadow it's that word that needs to follow form, not anything else in it's stead.
Truly one of the best deeds I've seen.