Steamをインストール
ログイン
|
言語
简体中文(簡体字中国語)
繁體中文(繁体字中国語)
한국어 (韓国語)
ไทย (タイ語)
български (ブルガリア語)
Čeština(チェコ語)
Dansk (デンマーク語)
Deutsch (ドイツ語)
English (英語)
Español - España (スペイン語 - スペイン)
Español - Latinoamérica (スペイン語 - ラテンアメリカ)
Ελληνικά (ギリシャ語)
Français (フランス語)
Italiano (イタリア語)
Bahasa Indonesia(インドネシア語)
Magyar(ハンガリー語)
Nederlands (オランダ語)
Norsk (ノルウェー語)
Polski (ポーランド語)
Português(ポルトガル語-ポルトガル)
Português - Brasil (ポルトガル語 - ブラジル)
Română(ルーマニア語)
Русский (ロシア語)
Suomi (フィンランド語)
Svenska (スウェーデン語)
Türkçe (トルコ語)
Tiếng Việt (ベトナム語)
Українська (ウクライナ語)
翻訳の問題を報告






CIV is first and foremost a HISTORICAL 4X game not a gathering place for CURRENT POLITICAL WOKES
UU: Katipunero
UB: Palengke
UI: Nipa Hut
UD: Kuta (I remember this was in previous version of Kudarat)
Also, may I suggest that Lapu-Lapu be made a unique governor instead of a leader. Thanks for all your mods by the way! Enjoying most of them.
I'm agreeing with the recent comments here as well, there's just.... I would call it "hype without a brain" for requests for Duterte and Marcos leaders.
Objectively speaking, those two, even combined, haven't really done much to stand out, at least by the standard of official Civ6 leaders. I can't even conceive of any good leader abilities for those two. At best their bonuses would be lackluster and quite boring, and at worst, not only completely useless, but harmful to the playstyle the Philippines is supposed to have in civ6, giving it a weaker game than usual. (Also how on earth is one supposed to turn a war on drugs into a leader ability, let alone a good/interesting one?)
If one really wants to know their real historical significance, just ask any Filipino living in the year 2122.
Also, I'm going with what Drinn says, political situation here is already tense and we don't need more oil being added to the dumpster fire
Yes, Vevut.