sorry i'm not part of this you can ignore ^-^;

Wouldn't it be more likely that Spinesaurdiidfehuyf (however it's spelt AAh) would have had a more reptillian look, without feathers? Just saying since they would have had a fishy diet, they would be more adapted to water- Like crocs, they have simularities, don't they? Plus if the Bary or Spino ect had feathers, that would have dragged them down if they got wet, right? Correct me if I'm wrong or what idk.

@Hippiegineer/Rexkiller I would've made it more accurate, but the stamp limit on the body part has been reached, but the head part isn't.

Also, the feathers on baryonyx are only speculative, as theropods like Carnosaurs, Megalosaurs, Ceratosaurs, and Spinosaurs don't really have any evidence of feathers yet, but it's possible that they most likely had some feathers on them in real life.

Make it accurate.

Honestly, this could of been made by a T. rex but Allosaurus just works as well.

Nice!

Also, I know that most paleo-geeks, like me, prefer the accurate dinosaurs, which have feathers and more fat in them, as well as mostly having to be not-so reptilian like.

@Hippiegineer I know it's not meant to be accurate, it's supposed to be my preferred style for most of my scribblenauts dinosaurs, so I do the style of dinosaurs that most people get used to, and I do have to say that it's got two fingers due to the limit of stamp space, it also has no dew claw due to stamp space, and the feathers are only speculative additions.

This is very innacurate. Firstly, baryonyx had three claws Secondly, where's it's dew claw? Thirdly, WHERE ARE THE FEATHERS?!?

Okay then